|
@hexagr | |||||
|
Weird that people will admit, even boast, about not updating their beliefs, but they would never want an AI running around that never updated its beliefs.
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Figment of Imagination
@stellahymmne
|
27. pro |
|
Updating beliefs is good and useful. Updating goals is slightly more precarious and should be done with great care if at all.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Stephan Bridger
@hexagr
|
27. pro |
|
I believe those concepts are intractable, thus cannot imagine anything that shouldn't be done with great care.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Dan Solitz
@dansolitz
|
27. pro |
|
How do you integrate beliefs into AI operating system? And if AI could believe would it generate a faith?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Stephan Bridger
@hexagr
|
27. pro |
|
This is the problem. How do we build the AI to become good, regardless of faith? The AI alignment problem is about humanity as much as it is about AI.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Dont Worry About It
@DontWor05692785
|
27. pro |
|
For sure, but it's easy to go from updating beliefs to hop-scotching to whatever is politically/socially/financially expedient
|
||
|
|
||
|
Symora ꙮ
@GlitchesBrew
|
27. pro |
|
the difference is that humans eventually die and get replaced
|
||
|
|
||
|
Psi Operator
@PomoPsiOp
|
28. pro |
|
Depends, how secure are those updates? Are they comparable with my setup? Will they break my workflow. A true power user will never update without checking first.
|
||
|
|
||