Twitter | Search | |
Search Refresh
PorzioBrombergNewman 1h
Subpoena safeguards include confidentiality and protective orders, as well as motions to quash or limit particular demands, was a key point made during litigation attorney Tanya Shah's presentation on the ethical considerations in serving and responding to .
Reply Retweet Like
Neal 39m
Replying to @RudyGiuliani
What constitutes ? Trump the Ukrainian president for a favor vice having Barr from having justice doing the work. What is illegal is the administration not obeying lawful . If he is innocent, he has nothing to hide.
Reply Retweet Like
78nineI0 12h
Replying to @ChuckCallesto
Good luck with those . They don’t mean anything anymore.
Reply Retweet Like
Carol 20h
now has her go at pontificating. Anyone saying anything about the staff that IGNORED .
Reply Retweet Like
PhatzNewsRoom 3h
Reply Retweet Like
78nineI0 14h
Good luck with those .
Reply Retweet Like
Trump Advisor Nov 19
Should Have Been Flying 11 Yrs. Ago ?
Reply Retweet Like
TP12 Nov 20
gives orders to defy Does not release or paper work related to hearings. Deflect, deny, distract. paints a disparaging picture toward honorable & legislators. major recall or ?
Reply Retweet Like
Greg.louderback Nov 20
anyone failing to honor citing precedent United States v Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974) No person is completely above the law; and the president cannot use executive privilege as an excuse to withhold evidence that is "demonstrably relevant in a criminal trial."
Reply Retweet Like
RodneyMedia Nov 19
Drag out the perfect Giuliani, the perfect Bolton and the perfect Mulvaney so we can hear about the perfect call.
Reply Retweet Like
Katherine Gypson 24h
Replying to @SpeakerPelosi @POTUS
"They should be coming before us," asked about compelling testimony from Pompeo, Mulvaney and others who are fighting Congressional for testimony in court.
Reply Retweet Like
PhatzNewsRoom Nov 21
Reply Retweet Like
DiDaDo 10h
Let's be realistic. This is a group of people whose oaths don't mean anything, otherwise they'd honor the one they already gave. They're scared. They screwed up, got caught, and now they're "omitting" to cover their fanny. Only facts and evidence work against that.
Reply Retweet Like
Josi ❄️#FBPE Nov 21
When you have to resort to insults and hysteria, you demonstrate ignorance and fear. Let witnesses answer .
Reply Retweet Like
PhatzNewsRoom Nov 21
Reply Retweet Like
Jill Nov 20
Subpoenas need to be reinforced
Reply Retweet Like
Njeanous Nov 20
Why is sitting there talking about being denied when the WH won't even allow to have access to his own records let alone share records with ? Does he even know has had 2 Different Presidents? One is not the other?
Reply Retweet Like
Ken Meyerson Nov 19
Replying to @CharlesPPierce
Sondland will soon be in one of those "if A=B and B=C then A=C" situations. oh my.
Reply Retweet Like
Maya Wiley Nov 19
suddenly cares abt House & lawyer rightly saying this isnt an issue of the Fifth amendment. This is about tryingnto expose a .
Reply Retweet Like
PhatzNewsRoom Nov 19
Reply Retweet Like