Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Pretraživanje Osvježi
Gunnar W. Klau 15 h
Finally out: Haplotype Threading: Accurate Polyploid Phasing from Long Reads Very proud.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Federico Marini 15. pro
Very nice work by Simoneau and colleagues - although, I am getting goose bumps at trying to digest Fig.2 (and this is really not a rant on pie charts 🙃)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Lior Pachter 22. kol 2018.
These authors write that "Most readers do not read the methods". For the record, I read the methods section of papers. This paper didn't have one. The authors just made stuff up and wrote a paper. . h/t
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Michael Hoffman 21. lip 2018.
Odgovor korisniku/ci @michaelhoffman
Her earlier work actually contained detailed flow charts, so I'll have to blame the lack of code above on space constraints (!). This is from the earliest publication I know that describes bioinformatics performed with a computer, in 1962.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eirik Halvorsen Wik 4. tra
First PhD study out! •Non-time-loss incidence depends on the person recording •Time-loss incidence not affected → Beware when interpreting studies using broad injury definitions and multiple recorders
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bogdan Pasaniuc 4. pro 2017.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keegan Korthauer 10. stu
Benchmarking of tools is an essential element of genomic data science. Check out this special issue of devoted to benchmark studies!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Steve Fisher 4. kol 2018.
I wonder who introduced Uzzah to the idea that methodology was not important? Any “thinking” person knows transporting the ark on a cart was more progressive and efficient than the outdated means of using poles. Hmmm...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Michele Busby 🐝 4. lip 2018.
New paper from from Joshua Levin's group! Comprehensive comparative analysis of 5′-end RNA-sequencing methods
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sam Minot 16. kol 2018.
Sampling the microbiome is full of instrument error, reagent bias, and biological confounders. So is all research. Use controls, run replicates, quantify your error, and approach all results with skepticism. Just like all research.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Raphael Gottardo 📊🧪🖥️ 19. velj
People don't necessarily realize that such citations are important to seek funding to maintain and continue development of such tools/packages. By not doing this, they are hurting the entire scientific community. Give credit where credit is due.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Conesa Lab 26. lip 2018.
We're thriled to see that officially recommends using for QC of novel isoforms in their new IsoSeq3 pipeline.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Jackman 1. stu
Day after day... this strange jerk of a man tweets out nonsensical statements yet because he has accumulated wealth and power... we are forced to listen...even though the means by which that wealth was attained is criminal.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sina Booeshaghi 1. velj
Fantastic analysis of how GTF and cDNA FASTA differ; performed by my colleague
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sina Booeshaghi 30. sij
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Ricardo Frausto 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @lpachter
For those studies where batch is an unavoidable factor (not certain if it’s the case here, will read when I can get past the paywall), batch correction is an important and often overlooked component of data analysis...and this speaks to . 1/2
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Stephanie Hicks 4. pro
If you are interested in analyzing data in using , please check out our paper Orchestrating single-cell analysis (OSCA) with that was published in this week!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dr. Jen Schradie 15. stu
The method section in 's article, "Toward a Dynamic Theory of Action at the Micro Level of Genocide: Killing, Desistance, and Saving in 1994 Rwanda" is so good that I had my intro to qual methods class read it out loud today.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Lisa Simpson 6. stu
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matt MacManes 6. lis
Hey someone has to develop those methods, and they are good data scientists too. As someone who thinks about methods, I’m sorta offended by your tweet.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"