Twitter | Search | |
Search Refresh
South Centre Sep 18
panel ruling on the inconsistency with rules of 25% imposed on 's products pursuant to a investigation confirms illegitimate use of measures by the . See See also
Reply Retweet Like
John Azzi Sep 15
today ruled tariffs on goods violated . may want to appeal but unlikely to occur before election because of he caused. For mine, cheap unsustainable Chinese imports are contrary 2 public morals despite GATT ruling
Reply Retweet Like
TradeVistas Sep 19
Neither nor the Agreement had direct bearing on international energy . Why role can play in encouraging efficient management of energy resources moving forward?
Reply Retweet Like
Jonathan J Darrow Sep 15
New Executive Order (9/13) requires HHS/ to implement prescription drug based on "most-favored-nation" principle, among countries. .
Reply Retweet Like
Ranvir Singh 🇮🇳 Sep 18
Design. It all starts with visit 2015. India signed the deal to do away with for farm produce under Privatisation of Kisan Mandis is the first step to do away with . Otherwise why's there no protection that these pvt Mandis will adhere to ??!!
Reply Retweet Like
Erik Denters Sep 14
This is justifiable as Art. XX (e) explicitly allows a ban for all products made in prisons. The should decide likewise. China, imprisoning 1 million Uighurs may be asked to proof that products are not made in . .
Reply Retweet Like
Manish Singh Sep 15
Replying to @DPJHodges
Meanwhile, panel concludes that US tariff on China is inconsistent with Articles I:1, II:1(a) and II:1(b) of 1994 US is the founder of GATT, WTO and they will ignore WTO Wonder if there'll be an outcry from the BBC, FT about the US reneging on the intl. treaty?
Reply Retweet Like
Rajyavardhan Pandey Sep 20
Replying to @RajyaVP
As a kid I have witnessed ruckus & debate everyday about agreemen signed by PV Narsimha Rao govt. Opposition (then BJP) was tooth & nail against the WTO agreement. Similarly with , opposition of the bill is theatrics. They won't repeal when they come to power.
Reply Retweet Like
Juampi Sep 16
MUY interesante hilo . Desde el nos vienen perjudicando con las excepciones que complicaban a quienes no se hubieran desarrollado industrialmente con anterioridad a ese acuerdo. Me recuerda la “meritocracia” donde jugamos una carrera y algunos largan 10 m delante!
Reply Retweet Like
SudOuest Archives Sep 19
🔎 Rien que pour vous, voici la du jour sélectionnée dans nos : le 19 septembre 1993 sur les craintes face au .
Reply Retweet Like
Juan Pippia Sep 16
La falló a favor de 🇨🇳Determinó que las subas arancelarias contra mercaderías chinas por parte de 🇺🇸 violan la normativa del y le recomendó que retrotraiga dichas subas.
Reply Retweet Like
Meiji Univ. International Law Sep 15
Reply Retweet Like
GATT 2h
Replying to @GATT_SM
第5回 GATT 日程:10月17日(土)13時30分~17時30分(入退室可) 場所:新宿 対象年齢:18歳から30歳まで 会場費:1人2000円 ※一般応募の方は下記フォームよりお申込みください。
Reply Retweet Like
Meiji Univ. International Law Sep 15
Reply Retweet Like
Daniel AJ Sokolov Sep 15
Trumps Strafzölle gegen China sind unzulässig | heise online
Reply Retweet Like