Twitter | Search | |
Search Refresh
Jay Sekulow Jul 10
Judge Kavanaugh is an immensely qualified conservative & has a proven record of unwavering commitment to the rule of law & the . Sign & RT to demand his swift confirmation:
Reply Retweet Like
Trish Regan 17h
They may not like this President. They may not like his politics or how he stands on issues. They may not like a conservative interpretation of the , but guess what? They’re going to have to deal with it because Donald Trump won the election.
Reply Retweet Like
Jay Sekulow Jul 6
listener: "We need a Justice who can interpret the with regard to its intent as it was written by the founders." Do you agree?
Reply Retweet Like
Jason Halle 🌊 Jul 14
Our Country needs to be Ruled by Law, Not by Supreme Court shouldn't be PACKED with YES MEN that Twist to the Criminal's Wishes Shouldn't Conduct Theatrical Hearings to try to protect Themselves & We need Three Honest Branches of Govt
Reply Retweet Like
Sophia A. Nelson Jul 13
President swore an oath to protect and defend the of the United States of America. He is completely in dereliction of that oath on this indictment via
Reply Retweet Like
Victoria Brownworth Jul 13
It is a failure of our that--unlike EVERY other nation in the world--we're not holding a new, fair, free election. History will not look kindly on those who failed to demand this & stand for/behind . That will be a legacy that lasts beyond any other.
Reply Retweet Like
🕯️Gospel Truth🕯️ Jul 12
The moon traveling around the face of the stationary flat earth with the stars, AT THE SAME SPEED! Impossible on a globe!
Reply Retweet Like
Shoman Lucky Jul 9
I started leading change that i want when I was still in School under Student Movement called Cosas as Johannesburg Regional Secretary I learned den graduated to ANCYL I also learned and moved to EFF because of change that i want to lead in my Community
Reply Retweet Like
Donna Smith McG 🦋❄️👩‍🎨 Jul 13
Replying to @donnasfineart
needs to remember could happen again if we don’t 🇺🇸 needs to come back to & for ALL‼️
Reply Retweet Like
ACLJ Jul 12
Why are claiming that placed in hotel rooms are ? The actually PROTECTS religious speech. Download our legal guide for more information.
Reply Retweet Like
Peter Schiff Jul 9
The was written to limit the power of the Federal Government, not to restain individual liberty. Activist justices have ignored the constitution under the guise of interpreting it. The must mend the broken chain that no longer binds the government!
Reply Retweet Like
Jay Sekulow Jul 10
The is clear: “no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office.” Now, more than ever, we must fight to ensure anti- bigotry against judicial nominees does NOT continue.
Reply Retweet Like
KramerArt Jul 10
In light of the recent pick, I couldn’t stay away from political cartooning any longer!
Reply Retweet Like
Dr J Ashok 🇮🇳 Jul 9
In a DEMOCRACY like INDIA which is, and shall be GOVERNED by the only (created under British Rule) is UNCONSTITUTIONAL & ILLEGAL. AIMPLB should IMMEDIATELY be BANNED, since day-by-day it's ACTIVITIES are becoming more & more ANTINATIONAL & ANTISOCIAL.
Reply Retweet Like
Pankaj Kumar Jul 12
You had no problems when governments amended the more than 100 times in the last 60 years , but you're wetting your pants in fear of an amendment which is nowhere to be seen! Btw, why can't government amend the , constitutionally?
Reply Retweet Like
I💚Dublin Jul 11
I feel im being attacked again because we decided I’d take a career break to raise our young children. That somehow being the woman in the home is the wrong view to hold.
Reply Retweet Like
☠️Bellatrix2018⚡️#FamiliasUnidas⚡️✝️🇺🇸🖖🏼 Jul 14
I’m afraid Remus is correct, Sir. It pains me to have to break this to you, but POTUS doesn’t control everything, no matter how much he or she may want to. The Founding Fathers designed it that way for a reason.
Reply Retweet Like
Right to Life Jul 14
Roe v. Wade subverted the Fourteenth Amendment to impose abortion on demand
Reply Retweet Like
AAP Ka Mehta Jul 9
In the Supreme Court today, While Delhi govt seeks a early date of hearing Central govt argues "all its law officers" are busy in Bench cases and trying to delay the hearing. SC agrees to Hear "Sometime in next week"
Reply Retweet Like
Jay Sekulow Jul 10
How does Judge view the and the role of a judge? We discuss on .
Reply Retweet Like