Twitter | Search | |
Search Refresh
Daniel Hanley May 14
The current focus toward improving and expanding private enforcement is really an underappreciated victory. Consider the fact that the majority in Apple v. Pepper acknowledged the value of private enforcement.
Reply Retweet Like
Leah Nylen May 10
. & make the case for an effective competition standard symposium
Reply Retweet Like
Harold Gardner 6h
Reply Retweet Like
Pallavi Guniganti May 16
Not what I've seen anyone else tweet about, but from what I heard via GCR reporters at , the most surprising thing said about was suggesting that it's not a "major" acquisition if the acquired company has few employees.
Reply Retweet Like
Jefrey Gomez 3h
Here's another good reason why initiatives must be taken against Alphabet Inc. / Google. It's time the China mobile & tech companies band together to come up with an alternative to and .
Reply Retweet Like
Wisconsin Law School May 16
Are big tech companies like Amazon & Facebook acting like monopolies? Prof. Peter Carstensen, an expert on law & policy, weighed in for
Reply Retweet Like
Simonetta Vezzoso 🏝 May 10
Replying to @Hahubelgobez
No playlist yet for ?
Reply Retweet Like
Acheter-moins-cher May 17
EUROPEAN, BE AWARE! Mme Vestager should not be at the head of the next Commission! (...)Vestager knows big fines look good but are ineffective on Ultra dominant companies like Google: it s a sort of dominance taxe they pass to their client with no harm to them.
Reply Retweet Like
excellencia 17h
Reply Retweet Like
freedomGetter 2h
desparately trying to annihilate always prevails. Nobody can beat no matter how much you hide it from ppl!
Reply Retweet Like
Adam Thierer May 10
wonder how many people advocating a FB breakup / divestiture of assets have ever heard of Judge Harold Green. Or examined the convoluted nightmare of enforcing line‐of‐business restrictions to prevent reintegration of old functions & services. Oh my, what fun! is hard
Reply Retweet Like
Amanda Lynn Castonguay May 15
Who's going to stop Disney?
Reply Retweet Like
lawprofblawg 11h
Replying to @elispsistired
I'm price fixing.
Reply Retweet Like
Girard Sharp LLP May 15
: Girard Sharp has amended its complaint to add a claim that , creator of , violated federal laws by colluding with to restrict the market for tax prep services, making our case the first nationwide with such allegations
Reply Retweet Like
What's Left of the Democrats May 17
Replying to @WhatsLeftofDems
“In 1992, the Democratic Party scrubbed all references to economic concentration and from its platform. Bill Clinton then led a successful, multi-year effort to overturn the Depression-era laws that had constrained the size and reach of banks.”
Reply Retweet Like
Nicklaus 21h
State law is intended to control/limit , when monopoles are the result of state ... contradiction 🤔
Reply Retweet Like
Mark Arjomandi May 16
: Chris Hughes is one of the original founders of .
Reply Retweet Like
Antitrust Intelligence May 17
Results from a quick poll with Antitrust agencies. More cartel probes coming? ,
Reply Retweet Like
Jarod Bona 9h
The U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division tells The Academy to watch their step. See how laws impact the proposed ban on .
Reply Retweet Like
Mario Zúñiga 11h
"Persistent myths in competition law (I): ‘the pro-competitive aspects of an agreement can only be considered under Article 101(3) TFEU’" vía
Reply Retweet Like