Twitter | Search | |
Search Refresh
GenevieveZzyzyx Feb 16
Replying to @EcoSenseNow
Science is suggesting trends based on data. Thats exactly how science sounds. Unknown variables can always arise, and thats why studies usually conclude with “more research is needed” more data = more accuracy
Reply Retweet Like
Jack Eddyfier 7h
Replying to @EcoSenseNow
Suggesting something "may" happen or that a computer model "might" predict the future looks like a wheeze for a grant application. It's a shame pseudoscience took over real science like this.
Reply Retweet Like
Mrs. Yost Feb 14
Valentine's Day scientists! what happens to a candy heart in soda? In vinegar? In baking soda and vinegar?
Reply Retweet Like
Wally Dunn 5h
. your assertions with out proof is foolish and dangerous. Your attempt at misdirection is obvious and craven.
Reply Retweet Like
David L. Hagen 7h
Why do Universities encourage and teach 's terrorism? And impose in place of ? Uphold our of , , and . Restore and the teach again the foundations of the .
Reply Retweet Like
Occam’s Chainsaw 24h
Problem: I want to do a blood smear. I don’t have methanol to fix it with. Hypothesis: I can use tequila Stay tuned.
Reply Retweet Like
The Venus Project Feb 13
proposes an alternative vision of what the future can be if we apply what we already know to achieve a sustainable new world civilization
Reply Retweet Like
CJ Ronneberg 9h
Replying to @GeraldKutney @MIT
Sorry, wrong! I deny nothing that scientists have proven beyond a doubt via . is NOT Science! It's more akin to an educated "guess" or divining with a dowsing rod looking for a sign of the impending Apocalypse of the you're peddling.
Reply Retweet Like
CJ Ronneberg 9h
Replying to @GeraldKutney @MIT
Einstein. What don't you get? Real scientists debate verifiable, established scientific"facts". Not, debateable, theoretical conjecture from a gaggle of "scientists" who accept "consensus",over ". Any "real scientist", not me, not you, would tell you the same.
Reply Retweet Like
Typical XJW - LQD Feb 15
I love the ! They think planets are formed this way or that way. Hey, look at that thing 4 BILLION miles away, 22 miles long, going 31,000 MPH. Analyze. Okay, now we know this one item was formed that way. Let's find more to check again!
Reply Retweet Like
P Woody Feb 9
Replying to @martinonyc
There’s a big difference between observation, analysis, and response () and videoing signals to gain an immediate, machine-driven non-human advantage. Your theory suggests we put F-1 cars on Indy tracks instead of learning the curves, or how to drive properly.
Reply Retweet Like
Tim vL Feb 8
Replying to @HobbySummerbell
Dawn Of War says they are red and visible and go pew pew, and Dawn Of War is one of the greatest pieces of 40k media ever, so I don't see any reason to doubt that they are red and visible and go pew pew
Reply Retweet Like
funky49 Feb 14
Perhaps Jim Bakker should test his hypothesis by contracting COVID-19/coronavirus and then get better with his snake oil?
Reply Retweet Like
Dennis L. Carpenter Feb 14
These brooms are standing up for more days than you stay at home scientists have said they would! Clearly more research is needed in this area! My broom is still standing two days later!
Reply Retweet Like
David L. Hagen Feb 9
Reply Retweet Like
Edwin Petersen Feb 12
Solution: Run a 1950s saloon and a modern car, both spotlessly clean, and count the numbers of insects that each collects on the same route. Answer: No difference in the numbers of insects on the vehicles; so insect numbers have fallen.
Reply Retweet Like
Chi Rho Feb 12
Pilot speaking Truth about the plane_t
Reply Retweet Like
Sard Imperium Feb 16
Reply Retweet Like
Everything Serious Feb 8
Because of being able to prove it time and time again. Time to junior!
Reply Retweet Like
Bradford L. Geyer Feb 16
Preposterous. 7th grade science: The requires that you control all dependent and independent variables. You don’t even pretend to have some that. This will ultimately whipsaw , strain its credibility and spur investigations.
Reply Retweet Like