Twitter | Search | |
Search Refresh
NHL Public Relations Sep 7
explains video review of Yanni Gourde’s goal at 4:03 of the second period in the / game.
Reply Retweet Like
Dominic May 16
Reply Retweet Like
jay madison Jul 9
Replying to @minter
That's not .. lol
Reply Retweet Like
Shaun Beacham Dec 23
Can please explain how they are going to address incompetent officials blowing good plays dead and ruining the game?
Reply Retweet Like
Brad Pond Dec 30
what said wasnt “unprofessional” or “unacceptable”. What’s unprofessional and unacceptable is the absolutely despicable level of officiating in the worlds “premiere” hockey league. Get your guys in line and this wouldn’t be an issue
Reply Retweet Like
Jason Wombold Mar 3
Could have explain “high sticking” call on Larsson at 17:07 of the 3rd period in / ?
Reply Retweet Like
Dale W Blindheim Aug 2
The ruling by is STANLEY CUP ~ AVALANCHE !
Reply Retweet Like
Sebastian Death Aug 12
Move higher paid offensive talent (not necessarily star players) for lowkey talented Two-Way defensemen and sign bargain value free agents on a 1 year deal (Think Mikheyev, Ennis, Spezza). Once defence is improved the offence will improve too
Reply Retweet Like
#LifeOnTheDock with Nikolai Busko Aug 2
I have no issue with the final decision. I remember the referee allowing the goal to stand as his initial call, and I did not see any evidence to overturn it. However, would consider using hundredths of seconds on the burn-in clock in the future?
Reply Retweet Like
Bruins Report Dec 23
. I can’t wait to read your bs politically correct explanation of the “no goal” call in the game
Reply Retweet Like