Twitter | Search | |
Search Refresh
Jamie Palmer Jan 11
On the Left: on what the has to say about diversity. On the Right: What actually wrote.
Reply Retweet Like
James Damore Oct 31
If the was actually sexist pseudoscience, would the media have spent so much effort to smear it?
Reply Retweet Like
Studio Glibly Jan 10
The media seriously undermines its credibility by blatantly misrepresenting a document that anyone with an internet connection can access.
Reply Retweet Like
Diana S. Fleischman Nov 26
Replying to @sentientist
And, like everyone, the last residual faith that I had, that I clutched lovingly, that most smart and well-meaning people can read anything that takes more than 4 minutes to read was nuked by the
Reply Retweet Like
Dr. Debra W Soh Nov 21
It's been 3 months and some people still can't be bothered to read the before giving an opinion
Reply Retweet Like
Dr. Katja Thieme Jan 10
“Logical debates pertaining to [the material of his ].” I’m chuckling imagining what those logical arguments would be. “Would you say uterus ⇒ neuroticism, or rather uterus ⇔ neuroticism? Or would you go so far as to say female-identified ⇒ neuroticism?”
Reply Retweet Like
James Damore Nov 21
Most balanced piece on . I brought up personality differences to de-gender workplace issues and diagnose the root cause. Alas, none of the criticisms addressed testosterone→systemizing→career preference.
Reply Retweet Like
Jamie Palmer Jan 11
Replying to @j4mi3p
Damore may be right or wrong but his arguments should be fairly represented. Either Penny (a) never read the , an unpardonnable failure of due diligence or (b) didn't understand it, in which case she shouldn't be commenting or (c) is deliberately misrepresenting it.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr Marianne Sep 21
This. Fucking. Guy. Yes that's dude, if you forgot. Desperate to be relevant..?
Reply Retweet Like
The Knife Media Mar 7
We analyzed Damore’s and how news outlets covered it. Here’s how they rated.
Reply Retweet Like
MarleneJ Aug 7
What a year it’s been, . Little did we know how life would change overnight after I tweeted this last August. Still proud to stand with you and support the . May you and prevail in the fight for justice.
Reply Retweet Like
Dr. Debra W Soh Nov 1
There's nothing more threatening to ideologues than the truth
Reply Retweet Like
Project 10 Podcast Nov 19
In episode 4, University of Michigans Prof Preston discusses the biological basis of offence, the explain offensive content and ex Google employee James Damore on his controversial . iTunes - Spotify - Podbean.
Reply Retweet Like
MarleneJ Oct 6
“Studying subjects that relate to people are traditionally considered to be feminine” sounds like it’s from . Oh, it’s science? 🤔
Reply Retweet Like
Neill_Clark Jan 12
'Only someone who has never faced real prejudice in their lives could possibly believe that centuries of violence and injustice are any sort of equivalent to not being allowed to scream and pull your pants down in public' -
Reply Retweet Like
Melanie Woodrow Jan 8
Waiting for & who will announce class action lawsuit against
Reply Retweet Like
Project 10 Podcast Nov 12
Fired from Google for his infamous . features on episode 4. Out soon, subscribe on & .
Reply Retweet Like
𝕝𝕧𝕝 𝟜𝟝 𝕔𝕙𝕒𝕠𝕤 𝕡𝕠𝕥𝕦𝕤 Nov 10
"author of the pro-diversity "
Reply Retweet Like
James Damore Oct 12
Replying to @JonHaidt
3/ I took ’s system, but forgot the human details and clumped them all as one group (yes I see analogy).
Reply Retweet Like
Mick Russom Aug 15
Replying to @RealJamesWoods
Reply Retweet Like