Twitter | Search | |
Search Refresh
남혜리(Hyeri Nam)♀️ 1 Mar 18
We need more women who speak out for women's rights. Is it really OK to let Korean Women's Association United choose a male feminist as a host of "International Women's Day" celebration?
Reply Retweet Like
Radfem Black 26 May 18
Replying to @RadfemBlack
So as you can see, or ? Pregnant women become pregnant people, so and are issues rather than exclusively struggles. Then we cannot complain about governments dominated by men deciding.
Reply Retweet Like
GrimKismet 17 Nov 18
making sure to erase women and women of color with your misogynistic and racist rhetoric all in one tweet. Women are not "menstruators," we are adult human females and our identity and experiences are not a costume.
Reply Retweet Like
NotAFeelingInAMan’sHeadCheckUrDefinition 19 Jun 18
Replying to @bo_novak
How often I dismissed the institutional linguistic swap from "sex" to "gender", thinking it was no big deal. Now I know I should've spoken up, because that's what got us into this mess. I will certainly speak up now. is a big deal and to gloss over it is misogyny.
Reply Retweet Like
Bad Squiddo Games - Annie Feb 8
Also, been in "media sulk" since the last big thing I got excited about being a part of was pulled on the basis that the stuff I researched the hell out of wasn't historical.
Reply Retweet Like
Satu Runa⛄ Jul 2
This is incredibly disappointing and a huge blow to women’s visibility in astronomy and STEM. Radfems saw this coming from miles away.
Reply Retweet Like
Oh What Now 28 Jan 18
Transactivist: "Make sure you're not on the wrong side of history!" Feminist: lol Women have ALWAYS been on the wrong side of history. It's called "The Patriarchy"
Reply Retweet Like
God Zilla Mar 27
Replying to @washingtonpost
This is more than just historical revisionism. THIS IS HISTORICAL VANDALISM. The now engages in historical vandalism. Morgane Oger considers females to be “a subset of women”. Like Oger, you obviously think women matter less than transwomen.
Reply Retweet Like
Ian McNee Mar 28
Replying to @washingtonpost
Yeah, because every woman who ever challeneged patriachal gender norms was in fact a man. Women have been erased from history for centuries by sexist ideology that denies female agency. Now post-modern trans-ideology is doing the same.
Reply Retweet Like
Emilie Kao Apr 2
Learn the facts about the . H.R. 5 Is No Act of Equality | The Heritage Foundation
Reply Retweet Like
Brave Heidi Jun 25
Replying to @feroztadla
Cause if it isn't about you, it's not worth talking about, isn't ?
Reply Retweet Like
Ian McNee Feb 21
& - wonder why so many are calling to ? Pure .
Reply Retweet Like
Clare Solomon ✊🏼🌈🦉 30 Apr 18
Not even one woman’s toilet?? And you wonder why we need campaigns like . .
Reply Retweet Like
Liza Vespi 🏁🕸✌ Oct 8
Exhibit A: . Search on "women murdered 2019" and these are the top 2 results Google returns. and are bang on. The game is rigged.
Reply Retweet Like
Oh What Now 6 Feb 18
Replying to @jameybash
A terrifying example of Only men can be transwomen. So to be considered a woman, I should self id as a man, then back as a woman again. Right? Since cis means to align with my observed birth gender & I've never aligned with sexist gender stereotypes, this works.
Reply Retweet Like
Chris Whitehead May 17
Replying to @MJB_SF
Uterus holders can't get pregnant without testicle holders involved at some point either, so by your rationale, you can't say men or man any more either. What your tweet is really doing is adding to the problem the world is facing.
Reply Retweet Like
Satu Runa⛄ 24 Jun 18
Replying to @SatuRuna
I will only converse with those who wish to find a solution that keeps EVERYONE safe and does not put girls at risk to potential abuse. Peace! ✌🏽
Reply Retweet Like
Robyn Apr 15
Replying to @transphilosophr
‘Linguistic terrorism’, what like womxn, bleeders, uterus havers, or cis... Sure, ok. Ironic?
Reply Retweet Like
Not effin CIS "deboosted" Dec 10
No mention of the word 'woman'
Reply Retweet Like
Kaeley Triller 15 Jun 18
Literal . Validation of your identity should not require the elimination of everyone else's.
Reply Retweet Like