Twitter | Search | |
Search Refresh
No Woo Woo Here May 20
The doesn't like the "unfortunate" attention it got when it estimated 1,400 deaths from . The fix: move away from peer-reviewed scientific data and change the math to lower that pesky projection. Sure, that's ethical.
Reply Retweet Like
AmericansAbroadForPete 15h
I had a professor say something in class once that has stayed with me ever since: “Often people will find that the best way to solve a problem is redefine it.” This is a perfect example. We need democratic leadership in office.
Reply Retweet Like
PoliticalRising 4h
Experts call out Trump's for redefining environmental standards to allow for more air pollution— "Let me be blunt: Trump is choosing to kill people in order to increase the profits of the polluting interests"
Reply Retweet Like
Lyngvie 15h
I guess we can call the administration the Killer Administration. This is simply appalling. Changing the calculations so that fewer premature deaths are predicted as they increase . The is doing this. via
Reply Retweet Like
Top news story
Bruce Bourgoine 11h
Trump = Environmental Poisoning Admiration
Reply Retweet Like
Antonia Zerbisias 24h
Donald Trump’s ‘pro-life’ (anti-woman) administration just killed a program on children’s health - Los Angeles Times
Reply Retweet Like
Phineas Flapdoodle productions: ? WARREN & BIDEN 2h
to reconsider cost benefit analysis of air pollution on human life!! The Trump administration will soon rewrite the factors it uses to determine the health risks of air pollution, a move critics warn will make it harder to place limits on emissions.
Reply Retweet Like
Prepare to Achieve 12h
There's so much you can do in 90 minutes.. read a book, watch a football match, even have a nap! Well FYI, it also only takes 90 minutes to complete the Situational Judgement Test element of your !
Reply Retweet Like
PC Survivors of Massachusetts 4h
Do you know, in the US, over 2.9 million tons of are disposed of each year with only 20% ending up being as outlined by the ? Be responsible, ensure your electronic devices are recycled responsibly. ♻
Reply Retweet Like
The Gatekeeper: Math in America 5h
Why learn math? We need to understand the math used to measure our health and design policies that govern our lives, so that we can respond appropriately when models become political. It can make the difference between life and death.
Reply Retweet Like
nancy r. strong 13m
Report: model will count fewer deaths to help favor coal plants via
Reply Retweet Like
Megan He 6h
"The proposed methodology would assume there is little or no health benefit to making the air any cleaner than what the law requires..."
Reply Retweet Like
Barbara Boxer 8h
"New math" in Trump's : If the numbers show your environmental rollbacks cause death & disease, just change the calculations. 2 + 2 = 3.
Reply Retweet Like
FairWarning 3h
The has allowed a major increase in the use of two antibiotics for citrus groves, ignoring objections from other federal health officials who are worried about effects on human health--that and more news in FairWarning's Warning Wire:
Reply Retweet Like
😈Blazor Wulf😈 8h
Reply Retweet Like
JSI Time 4h
EPA Administrator Wheeler Sends Cost-Benefit Analysis Memo to Assistant Administrators
Reply Retweet Like
Jeff Martens 12h
chooses short-term citrus profits over long-term human health
Reply Retweet Like
Paul Hallasy 9h
If the rules say you’re polluting, changes the rules.
Reply Retweet Like
Jon Perr May 20
First tax cuts, now deadly pollution. When the math produces an inconvenient result, the GOP just changes the math.
Reply Retweet Like
Lora Fisher 🌎 3h
Does ANYONE trust the E.P.A. these days?
Reply Retweet Like
BIoR 4h
Do you have Apprentices at Gateway? Do you need an EPAO? contact us! 0162 232 0991
Reply Retweet Like