Twitter | Search | |
Search Refresh
Maurits Westerik 14h
"Maybe someone else in my house did it" is not an effective infringement defense by itself, says in the case of ebook publisher Bastei Lübbe against Mr Strotzer: you have to show that someone else did in fact do it.
Reply Retweet Like
EU Court of Justice 15h
Rule of Law: Hungary challenges before the the ’s resolution on the triggering against this State of the procedure under Article 7 (1) TEU (case number C-650/18)
Reply Retweet Like
Wayne John 6h
Tony Blair and began this attack onto the working class UK community, the and the are equally responsible.
Reply Retweet Like
EU Court of Justice 21h
: the owner of an Internet connection used for copyright infringements cannot be excluded from liability by simply naming at least one family member having access to that Internet connection
Reply Retweet Like
Financial Services 14h
Reply Retweet Like
Bert Gevers 12h
on abort costs. Read the full update below 👇👇👇👇
Reply Retweet Like
Nana P 19h
We have habit of muddling through constitutional and legal ambiguities for years eg West Lothian question So unless we have clean break from , etc, Westminster will try to force indefinite transition period making UK a colony of Brussels
Reply Retweet Like
Bloomberg Tax 14h
EU High Court May Still Influence Tax Cases Post-Brexit
Reply Retweet Like
Stuart Budd #PeoplesVote 🇬🇧🇪🇺❄️ Oct 14
You are getting yourself tied up in knots. The only type of possible is a Brexit in name only variant. EFTA, Associated agreement etc, all containing elements of the , and If that is OK with you then fine, otherwise there is the
Reply Retweet Like
Stuart Budd #PeoplesVote 🇬🇧🇪🇺❄️ Oct 14
The U.K. can not leave elements of the , and It is not legally possible due to the WTO rules, GFA and the EU not splitting the (our) That is why people call it Brexit in name only. EFTA is possible though. Canada+ is not.
Reply Retweet Like
Geor Oct 16
Replying to @AngusMacNeilSNP
And we all know how Boudicca ended...
Reply Retweet Like
Assosementi 16h
In his response on behalf of , Mr Eustice said: “We disagree with the judgement the has come up with. We think is largely an extension of conventional breeding techniques, the likes of which we have had for decades".
Reply Retweet Like
AdGuy.uk 17h
is the Never Ending The 1972 also known as the Change Leader of no10 & 11 Job Dune via
Reply Retweet Like
julie peters Oct 14
<the is nowBehavingAs anti-democratically asThe EU- European journalists in 2015 tookA case2the re. the £3600/month un-receipt-able expenses allowance of 's.(That was onTopOfTheir salaries&generous pension deals).The European Court of 'Justice' rejected it
Reply Retweet Like
Michal Kianička 13h
Submitting an action or other legal documents to the of the in from 1 December 2018? Only electronically through !
Reply Retweet Like
Stanley_Walker Oct 13
Replying to @DCBMEP
This typifies , the is an EU institution and not capable of ruling over leaving EU. Art50 is explicit and does not need international interpretation.
Reply Retweet Like
Gordon Mackenzie #FBPE Oct 16
Can the European Court of Justice not force UK to give these funds to Scottish farmers as the EU intended?
Reply Retweet Like
Gordon Mackenzie #FBPE Oct 17
But all 27 EU countries would have to agree to extend Article 50 and very unlikely to do so except perhaps for a new vote on staying in the EU or leaving
Reply Retweet Like
Gordon Mackenzie #FBPE Oct 17
Don't be fooled by a transition period we would be out of EU after Article 50 expires on 29 March. Essential to withdraw Article Article 50 BEFORE it expires
Reply Retweet Like
Stuart Budd #PeoplesVote 🇬🇧🇪🇺❄️ Oct 14
Sorry, not fully correct. The , and are required for Northern Ireland. That includes the and Boris signed the UK up to permanent ECJ representation a few months ago. This is why will only every be a type of BINO
Reply Retweet Like