Twitter | Search | |
Search Refresh
Rex Doctor 3m
Replying to @secupp @RiskyLiberal
Except there's no legitimate way toward it.
Reply Retweet Like
Gabriel Ruiz Dec 5
Replying to @DailyCaller
Firearms, alcohol and voting...three things that have their own amendments, but only TWO of those things require you have an ID 🤨
Reply Retweet Like
Gölök Z Buday (The Black Jester) #vaneast Libertar 2h
A Judge need not know anything more than law. Perhaps some others. Most judgements are around constitutionality though.
Reply Retweet Like
charlievp Dec 6
1/ If you style yourself a expert but exhibit clearly inconsistent views depending on partisan circumstances, it hardly recommends you as an unbiased arbiter. seems, like , to find himself at the center of esp. partisan fire fights...
Reply Retweet Like
─═  єĞĞ𝐬 Δ𝓒𝐊lεЎ ═─ Dec 7
So, the only peeps that believe are the cult following of his and all the other lawyers under oath are lying? and very me thinks
Reply Retweet Like
#BRUCEHAWES Dec 4
Replying to @BarbMcQuade
Law professors are very valuable to the Americans. They are not boring. They are informants of what is the basis of our freedoms and rights as Americans. , even a teenager could win a case if they paid attention to the form of a motion.
Reply Retweet Like
Jim Weller 15h
Replying to @brianstelter
Keeping your head down during a Crisis is not putting the interests of our first.
Reply Retweet Like
victoria_4 7h
Hey Since y'all now the experts riddle me this. Is it to run guns to a cartel? Thanks
Reply Retweet Like
Younique a'la M 13h
As scholar Michael Gerhardt recently testified, Trump's actions "are worse than the of any prior president," and "if what we are talking about is not impeachable, then nothing is ."
Reply Retweet Like
A. A JOHN O Dec 6
Is there a cure for ’s ?
Reply Retweet Like
Laureate Program Comparative Constitutional Law 10h
Prof Stephen Gardbaum kicking us off at with a Masterclass on ‘The Populist Challenge to ’ — talking about what is happening, why it is happening, how it is happening and what can be done.
Reply Retweet Like
SalientPoint Dec 2
Replying to @BillKristol
And "if" he defies the SCOTUS will there then be a to restore our order?!?
Reply Retweet Like
GWIII Dec 4
Replying to @GOPLeader @seanhannity
yeah that Scholar should be able to mansplain this to all of us
Reply Retweet Like
Younique a'la M 13h
scholar Noah Feldman put it in even more stark terms in his testimony: "If we cannot a president who his office for personal advantage, we no longer live in a ."3
Reply Retweet Like
Just Jim Dec 7
Sounds like these need to be sent to a re-education course for law review taught by actual constitutional scholars.
Reply Retweet Like
Robert J Wolf MD Dec 3
Replying to @Benhardt_Constr
Love Gandhi!
Reply Retweet Like
rainpanda ☮♿🗽🌊🐋 Dec 4
Mr Eisen, you were professional and quite effective. Kudos to et al for choosing you to elicit testimony for the Dems from the professors!
Reply Retweet Like
Teri O Dec 5
Replying to @thehill
When is this gonna stand up to his responsibility?!!
Reply Retweet Like
adlib Dec 4
Replying to @GOP
The fact that the posts such a post to discredit scholars makes me think they are scared of what Constitutional scholars have to say. Good one gop. Looking as good as trump.
Reply Retweet Like
Laureate Program Comparative Constitutional Law 6h
Manuel Cepeda the former President of the of is presenting the 2nd Master Class today on ‘The Constitutional Law of Colombia’
Reply Retweet Like