Twitter | Search | |
Search Refresh
* W. Brett Wilson * Sep 10
will KILL future infrastructure in Canada. It will KILL our ability to compete on a global basis. It will KILL both foreign and domestic investment in Canada. We already struggle as a nation. We must encourage MPs and Senators to KILL BILL (69)
Reply Retweet Like
* W. Brett Wilson * Sep 16
It is designed to over-think the decision making processes for NECESSARY INFRASTRUCTURE for the great nation of Canada 🇨🇦 We MUST get to global markets.
Reply Retweet Like
Ken Chapman Sep 15
What's the difference now re political discretion on natural resource project approvals? We saw exercise so much abusive political discretion the Courts denounced his govt in review. may have flaws but the 10 reasons are very weak rebuttals!
Reply Retweet Like
Brent Patterson Feb 9
McKenna's pipeline-friendly Bill C-69 fails to protect water or make environmental assessments credible
Reply Retweet Like
Renee Reyle B 29 Apr 11
Support MPPs of ! Stop people from dying from CO.
Reply Retweet Like
Jamie Cleveland 18 Nov 15
Leo described as "outstanding" again! How do they say it w/ a straight face??
Reply Retweet Like
Maddy 🐻 5 Feb 13
I'm going to become the Prime Minister of Canada, and I'm going to make it legal to wear no pants in public
Reply Retweet Like
ddobell Sep 16
Replying to @WBrettWilson
Canada doesn’t have to worry about because there will be no jobs to worry about. Fucking
Reply Retweet Like
philip kuefler Sep 15
Replying to @lraitt
We vote you in, we pay you, we give you a pension and this is what we get? Where is your moral outrage, where is your courage, where is your anger, where is your conviction, where is your integrity, oh yeah, that's right, you're a politician.
Reply Retweet Like
Mister Quagmiiller Sep 14
Bill C-69 needs to be killed! This is an important article - please read, contact your senators and retweet!
Reply Retweet Like
Sandra 🌹🌞🌚 Sep 11
Tomorrow at 7 pm MDT with - Goodbye NEB.. Hello omnibus rewrite with too many empty blanks.. (SunnyWays ha!)
Reply Retweet Like
Mr. Lloyd #PPC2019 Sep 11
give it read. Isn’t there enough red tape holding back our country from prosperity? Do our children’s future mean nothing to these people?
Reply Retweet Like
#cdnpoli Current Day Sep 10
Replying to @WBrettWilson
I want it to pass even more because it’s Nice 👍
Reply Retweet Like
Joe Habakkuk Sep 4
** Political Tweet** Why is pretending to care about the when they have approved which makes future approvals of any new projects almost impossilbe? Hey - how about you ask?
Reply Retweet Like
Brent Patterson May 14
House of Commons committee debate on (environmental reviews and water protection) should be extended!
Reply Retweet Like
Will Dubitsky Apr 28
4 it is abt strong commitments to coupled w greenwashing on enviro impact analyses 4 +
Reply Retweet Like
Wilderness Committee Mar 29
Canada has required environmental assessments of projects that affect the environment for over 40 yrs. A planning tool, EA is essentially about ‘looking before you leap’.
Reply Retweet Like
BigJMcC Mar 28
, “As long as I get to say what’s in them - and what’s not. Oh, and don’t even think about third-party arbitration.”
Reply Retweet Like
Brent Patterson Mar 2
Reply Retweet Like
Brent Patterson Feb 27
Liberals move 'time allocation' on Bill C-69, legislation on environmental reviews and navigable waters
Reply Retweet Like