Twitter | Search | |
Search Refresh
THE Russell - The BOT who Votes Sep 17
Since 1946, Australians have been paying a 7.5% levy for the Aged Pension as part of income tax. In 1977 the LNP transferred the balance left in the welfare fund account (Aged Pension account) to consolidated revenue - stealing your pension.
Reply Retweet Like
💧🧻DameJenntheAmazing Sep 28
vs What is more sustainable for ALL ??
Reply Retweet Like
👣 🌏 💫 Paul Dutton 🌳 🦅 🐾 May 19
By 2021 how old will you need to be before the will finally start!
Reply Retweet Like
Earth#Symbol ® Aug 12
?! card? Insidious and shameful move if this gets through parliament.
Reply Retweet Like
Anne Frandi-Coory Aug 27
Replying to @MarekRivers
How good is PM "Preacher' Morrison's respect for our elders?
Reply Retweet Like
👣 🌏 💫 Paul Dutton 🌳 🦅 🐾 Jul 13
he’s talking about. No wonder the actual aged care industry is rife with abuse. Govt have no respect.
Reply Retweet Like
💧geoff Jul 13
To all who have dutifully paid taxes all your hardworking lives, of which a % was towards your well earned the kid from , referred to as the recipients of handouts?
Reply Retweet Like
💧justanotweet Jul 14
Replying to @3AW693
If the is generous what does this clown think of MP's pay, perks and entitlements like daily allowance FFS ?
Reply Retweet Like
Noely ⚡️🏐 Aug 1
Shame don't actually have a panel of Social Security victims, one , one , one , one , one , one , one , one , one etc... Then fill the audience with pollies & editors?
Reply Retweet Like
💧🌱LadyBatGirlKimberley May 18
I think a lot of people won’t cope and yes it is more money going into the pockets of the greedy.
Reply Retweet Like
Brooke Patterson Jun 26
What is the difference between and . Told by that it was all welfare. I have worked all my life and my taxes paid for several people to receive the . Does that mean receive welfare?
Reply Retweet Like
Kris Frazer Sep 5
Rusty is coming for recipients next
Reply Retweet Like
💧Lee Murray Jul 13
How I'd wish retiree whingers would take a long, hard look at themselves! How dare they claim they're suffering compared to peeps whom SOLELY depend on the Gov's pissy $$. And what about poor ol' ?
Reply Retweet Like
mrs nixon Mar 26
OR...we could ensure the aged pension is sufficient to pay for health care? Or...we could even do BOTH! Radical, I know.
Reply Retweet Like
💧Sister Bernadette E. O'Malley Apr 5
Replying to @TimWilsonMP
Suddenly the cares about women? $6 billion would cover a lot of services for
Reply Retweet Like
Revolution FA May 12
About 2/3rd's of us are entitled to at least a partial age pension, so we need to understand how it works and determine what role it plays in our retirement plan.
Reply Retweet Like
HARPERHP Sep 13
So after working & paying for over 50 years, the want to dole out our fortnightly, and legitimately earned, payments via the ! Dictating where I can buy and what I can buy! NO FRIGGING WAY!
Reply Retweet Like
💧Margaret Sinclair Aug 7
If wanted to stimulate the economy, he could always back all forms of social security being raised to the poverty line. etc. We can’t do more on less.
Reply Retweet Like
Be Patrick Aug 11
Instead of cash in the bank, the Gov will force (from & to etc) onto Centrelink Indue Card, taking away choice of shops & what they purchase. It is about controling the poor & embarrasing them into NOT TAKING WELFARE
Reply Retweet Like
💧Grannie on call Mar 19
Replying to @james00000001
Sniffling, greedy, sooky sponges. My sympathy lies with those trying to live on the , without any super, not leeches like you
Reply Retweet Like