Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Mike Elias 💡📈
“the Blackbeard of armchair psychology” · ☯️🎸🛸🤫 · 3D Trading · Founder
8.574
Tweetovi
5.003
Pratim
1.725
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Mike Elias 💡📈 8 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @balajis
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 proslijedio/la je tweet
Mike Elias 💡📈 1. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @harmonylion1
2/ Send : HERE if you think it’s a bioweapon, accidentally or deliberately leaked: 0xD29AceEAE4b245AE5c6DB0B615d5D4fC2441168B HERE if you think it’s 100% natural: 0x61f89E00034f4C4C62bc9B7154Ca1B38cC025c55 Also vote (threads below)👇
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 16 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @KetoAurelius
There is no meritocracy on a corporate platform. This is an idea meritocracy:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 16 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @EricRWeinstein @RayDalio
We’re fixing this with markets:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 16 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @EricRWeinstein @RayDalio
Corporate media is the central bank of narratives.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 16 h
"Quality" is like "value." Measure it with markets.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 16 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @BetterCeo
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 19 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @korcankaraokcu @dinodaizovi
I’m being sincere. What’s cringy about it?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 19 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @jwmares @balajis @tferriss
How many famous people can get famous pseudonymously, on merit alone? If there’s a way to determine fame pseudonymously, that would be a cool thing to investigate.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 22 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @leoncastilloVC
Ah, yes! I see this as a great argument for ruling out possibilities for “what to work on.” I meant ruling out possibilities for “what might be true” — do you think the same applies?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 22 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @iKinuthia_ @balajis @eriktorenberg
The point is that moral pioneers, who not only achieved “progress” within themselves but inspired it in others, didn’t require tech to do so. Therefore: Neither do we. Tech seems to be a force multiplier for the morals we have. Internet creates both wisdom and addiction.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 22 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @iKinuthia_ @balajis @eriktorenberg
I’m referring to moral progress as an inner (psychological/spiritual) phenomenon that the all-time greats achieved without reliance on technology. Buddha may be a better example than Gandhi in this case, since one couldn’t argue Gandhi didn’t benefit from printing press etc
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @EdLatimore @pgayed i 2 ostali
Fascinating! Hadn’t heard this view before. Is refusing to take control — eg victimhood, blaming circumstances and other people, giving up — also amoral?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @EdLatimore @ani_pai i 2 ostali
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @lpolovets @tomaspueyo
1) Absolutely agreed. The current system has failed — something else needs to be tried. What kind of system could work, and where could its funding come from? 2) I prefer Bernie’s, but doesn’t this just mean all assets are used to decide how much income tax you’ll pay?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @lpolovets @tomaspueyo
1) This seems to indicate we have a long way to go before diminishing returns on alleviating poverty 2) Maybe, but there’s no excuse for the homelessness crisis 3) “Tax the rich” plans tend to involve higher annual income taxes, ie cash. Nobody is advocating seizing assets.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @tomaspueyo @balajis @eriktorenberg
I’m not sure I understand! Could you break it down a bit? 😊
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @liuzirou @ani_pai i 2 ostali
Yes, this is the quote I was trying to google 💪
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg @seanlinehan i 3 ostali
Yes, 100%. I’m a big fan of what blockchain could enable here that’s never been possible before. Following and — also I really like your “make equity more universal” idea. cc
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mike Elias 💡📈 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @visakanv
Some signals to note: 1) Casualties are cremated to prevent spread. Rumors coming from China are that bodies are being cremated en masse without being reported. 2) American media is telling people NOT to panic (when does that ever happen)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"