Twitter | Search | |
Hannah Francis
arts editor sometimes musician ~ plant enthusiast ~ views panoramic ~ retweets lazy ~ Wurundjeri land
7,208
Tweets
3,255
Following
3,513
Followers
Tweets
Hannah Francis 3h
Terrifying, mesmerising, magical: Harry Potter lives up to the hype via
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis Feb 19
Replying to @PeterPaltos
Congrats Peter
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis Feb 19
Renowned design teams to create public space for $1b Melbourne arts precinct via
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis Feb 19
Replying to @nakkiahlui
Following
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis Feb 16
Replying to @DemiseTime @ElizaJBarr
Lol no i just understand English? Read the tweet
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis Feb 15
Replying to @DemiseTime @ElizaJBarr
Not her legal issues. The DMs and the family involved.
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis Feb 15
This sucks hard
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis retweeted
Crikey.com.au Feb 14
What will we lose if arts journalism disappears?
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis Feb 14
Replying to @sperman1313
thank you
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis retweeted
Brian The Ruminator Feb 14
Mate I love his music too but it is becoming abundantly clear he is a fucking creep. The FBI is investigating. It is encumbent on us blokes to show women like that we can argue for habeas corpus but not be an arsehole
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis Feb 14
Replying to @lynchonswan
yeah i know. lol! normally i would. just shits me when it's a matter close to my heart & ppl insist they are being logical despite you outdoing them in every move - and still won't concede defeat because they can't bear to be wrong. thanks for your support here and re. the paper!
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis Feb 14
Replying to @sperman1313
stop trolling. i've replied.
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis Feb 14
1. no they haven't. you have a very low opinion of men. that is not helping. 2. see power dynamics. this is addressed i the story. you choose to ignore it.
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis Feb 14
Mate, Ansari is a vastly different case. If you are still not convinced these women are traumatised, regardless of the shades of grey - no one is saying it's not complicated - that says everything about you.
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis Feb 14
so don't throw words like 'rational' and 'intuition' around in the gendered way that you have. it's offensive, sexist and prehistoric. go back to school.
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis Feb 14
you don't show any sign that you understand how damaging this is. you are blind to the social power dynamics involved (read=context). But take gender out of it: it's irrational to believe one person's testimony when it contradicts that of a dozen. 3/
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis Feb 14
you don't appear to understand how journalism works. if you don't want to trust NYT because you believe Trump's 'fake news' slander, that's your bag. but don't offend and insult countless women everywhere by insisting we must continually 'prove' ourselves. 2/
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis Feb 14
they have proof. they wouldn't have run the story without it. there are libel laws that prevent this and they are no amateur outfit. it's a delicate matter and it's very entitled and uncompassionate of you to want to 'see' the texts of women who feel abused and manipulated. /1
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis retweeted
Samantha Kramer Feb 14
So you want these women to relive their trauma more deeply & publicly than they have before you'll condemn Adams? The Times saw them & verified. They exist. That's not good enough unless YOU get to see them? You're tweeting out Adams' videos as if this is a joke, man. Come on.
Reply Retweet Like
Hannah Francis Feb 14
Reply Retweet Like