Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
halvarflake
In multiple recent disclosure discussions on Twitter, I had said I will write a longer blog post about my views. I finally found the time to jot them down. I expect almost every reader to disagree with something vehemently. Enjoy "Disclosure Rashomon":
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Shahar Tal 17. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @halvarflake
Well written. I particularly agree with the ‘hero of their own story’ concept which applies to other fields. People will justify their opinions once they picked a side (or one was picked for them), and acknowledging alternatives have valid reasoning require uncommon levels of EQ.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Shahar Tal 17. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @halvarflake
I will offer one perspective that I found untouched by your post: the underlying assumption that 0day exploitation is malicious by nature and results in "mild discomfort to death". 0days can be and are exploited against evil, and do result in saving lives and averting disasters.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matt Linton 🐦👨‍💻⚕️⚒️🥋🎻 17. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @halvarflake
This is an exceptionally well-written and insightful piece, undercut only by the fact that it assumes and requires end users to rational actors :)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
halvarflake 17. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @0xMatt
You don't have to assume that they are rational to decide that giving them the option to be rational is the right thing to do.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
halvarflake 17. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @4Dgifts
I wish I could retweet this :-)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
halvarflake 17. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @chrisrohlf
My view is that people's ethical judgement is often strongly influenced by what they can buy by slightly adjusting it, and few people reflect on this enough.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
http 17. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @halvarflake
Actually I fully agree with your post. One comment though: If you mention Microsoft as an example, you might also want to mention their TwC initiative 17 years ago, stopping all development for a while. But yes, there was a business need for this change.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
halvarflake 17. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SwissHttp
Microsoft *has* made the TwC investments and at least partially foregone taking some of the excess profit, and that is good. At the same, I guess it wasn't nearly enough, as net societal risk has gone up since then.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"