Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
hakwan lau
i'm conscious.
1.897
Tweetovi
1.124
Pratim
2.316
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
hakwan lau proslijedio/la je tweet
John Henderson 15 h
I just had a basic science NIH proposal withdrawn by CSR, three wks before study section, because they decided it's a clinical trial, even though the definition and a case study says it isn't. So if you're hoping to submit as a non-clinical-trial, you may want to reconsider. 1/2
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau 15 h
i heard this thing is career-changing. certainly had some excellent postdocs who got their training there. one is apparently an organizing faculty member there now too. recommended.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau 15 h
btw, i also heard that the Rahnev lab is hiring - can't go wrong on this one
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau proslijedio/la je tweet
IndoPacific News 4. velj
This is what happens to people that talk in social media about what is really happening in Chinese police will pay you a visit: 👮🏻‍♂️ "The first is a warning, the second is jail time" says the policeman. That's China under Mao 2.0
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau 21 h
so long, Austin. thanks for inviting me for such a wonderful visit. finally get to meet + many others, & to catch up w/ . UT Austin cog neuro rocks!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau proslijedio/la je tweet
Daniel Dennett 3. velj
I have just finished reading Edward Snowden’s book Permanent Record. Everybody should read it. Seriously. His whistleblowing is not over.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau proslijedio/la je tweet
Doby Rahnev 3. velj
The Confidence Database is now out in ! It has 145 datasets with data from over 8,700 participants and almost 4 million trials. THREAD
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @faustroll @NeuroYogacara i 3 ostali
illusionishm?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau 2. velj
"this is supposed to be about the empirical science of consciousness, not writing autobiographies".
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau 2. velj
there's a real need for some clinical anthropology / trans-cultural psychiatry work to be done in HK re: the police brutality->PTSD situation. anyone interested in potentially getting paid to travel over there to do some field work (after the virus is gone), *email* me?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau 2. velj
after a whole-day, discussion-based, small group meeting, someone asked if i am tenured. am i still not arrogant enough yet?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @NeuroYogacara @onemorebrown i 2 ostali
strong enough illusionism
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @onemorebrown
and then when they are hallucinating, you tell them: “u are in the control group. u only think u r tripping, but you are not.”
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau proslijedio/la je tweet
Jay Van Bavel 1. velj
The comments section of the internet:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau 1. velj
i was a first generation high school student ;-)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau 31. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @KouMurayama @micahgallen
i like the idea of getting more face models in by randomly assigning different ones to different subjs
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau 31. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @micahgallen
some reviewer will complain that you only use 1 or just a few face models. to them the psychophysical precision may not matter as much as representativeness of the face samples. maybe there’s a fine balance one can strike to make everybody happy.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau 31. sij
this is a quiet day! joking
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau 31. sij
or like Dennett says: when you see something green there is nothing green in your head. so when you see something at time T, the neural events causally relevant also don't need to be occurring at exactly time T.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
hakwan lau 31. sij
i suppose they can also say: the same circuit definitely contains activity not reflecting post-perceptual cognition. so post-perceptual cognition cannot be the confound that explains everything in this PFC circuit, which generally reflects conscious content. sounds better? ;-)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"