Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
grsecurity
Foundational security for the Linux kernel. Solving the most difficult memory unsafety problems. Created by
2.724
Tweetovi
2
Pratim
6.457
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
grsecurity 6 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @msuiche
Storing this here: ee64c081fcfcdd78091f823c15e7886c9f8a61e38b078fc9298d427414a5682c
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity 11 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @grsecurity
Typo: the above should have read 2011, not 2001 (though these subscription policies have been in place and widely-accepted for just as long)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity 13 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @grsecurity
This would make every Linux vendor, including all Linux kernel developers themselves, a GPL violator. You are free to root your cell phone, but the GPL doesn't magically force the vendor to support the breakage you caused. It didn't prevent you from making the modification
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity 13 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @grsecurity
If it's an "added term" to exercise your own rights that in no way affect a user's ability to exercise their own GPL-granted rights of modification and distribution, then refusing to support a customer who has modified the software you provided them would also be a GPL violation
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity 13 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @grsecurity
SFC on Red Hat's identical subscription model: "GPL Expert Gives Red Hat The All-Clear", from 2001 "I'm not persuaded that it's a 'further restriction'."
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity 13 h
FSF (creators of the GPL itself) on an identical subscription model as ours, from 2004: "I see no problems with this model. [...] you are under no obligation to supply future releases to anyone."
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity 13 h
A statement from our legal counsel on today's Appeals Court decision:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity 18 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @msuiche
STACKLEAK has a 1% hit on kernel compilation too, doesn't at all mean STACKLEAK is cheap, just that the "benchmark" spends 99% of its time in userland, helping dilute whatever real performance hit exists
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity 18 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @msuiche
Outside of what would be mentioned there though, its reason for existence is based on a falsehood: "Backward edge CFI is not available for X86 at all today", typical bad/useless benchmarks: "1% hit in kernel compilation" 1% of what? kcbench "points" (elapsed wallclock)?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity 19 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @msuiche
Would prefer to leave it for a Blackhat talk or something of that sort 😉
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity 19 h
Added a few more, got through half of the list from 2018 on before my hands started cramping. Current count is now 464 😀
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity 5. velj
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @solardiz
No problem!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity 2. velj
beta patch for 5.5.1 has been released to beta testers, enjoy!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity 2. velj
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity 1. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Darkarnium
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity proslijedio/la je tweet
Mathias Krause 1. velj
Very proud and happy to join the team 😊
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity 1. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @HacKurx @_minipli
You were right :)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity proslijedio/la je tweet
Open Source Security Inc. 1. velj
Our team is growing! Very happy to welcome as our newest full-time kernel developer, accelerating our development of the next generation of features
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
grsecurity 1. velj
Extremely excited to finally welcome to the team!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"