Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Alex Naka
Things that are not required to be a scientist: -Having a PhD -Publishing peer-reviewed papers -Getting paid to do research Things that do make you a scientist: -Using the scientific method to study stuff That's it, that's the whole list.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Alex Naka 25. srp
Odgovor korisniku/ci @gottapatchemall
I want to expand on this - I wrote this yesterday bc I saw some lame tweets gatekeeping on this topic. It reminded me of a time when I was a third year PhD student and a layperson told me I couldn't call myself a scientist
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Naka 25. srp
Odgovor korisniku/ci @gottapatchemall
this was obviously a really ignorant take on his part - I was literally doing science all day - but it got under my skin a lot
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Naka 25. srp
Odgovor korisniku/ci @gottapatchemall
my point here is not to say that these things are unimportant. if you want to do good science, then getting a phd, publishing papers, and participating in professional scientific communities are very obviously good things to do
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Naka 25. srp
Odgovor korisniku/ci @gottapatchemall
nor am I trying to say that 'a person who uses the scientific method' = a perfect and comprehensive definition of 'scientist'
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Naka 25. srp
Odgovor korisniku/ci @gottapatchemall
my point is only that the heuristics many people use to identify scientists are not actually fundamental to doing science or being a scientist
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Naka 25. srp
Odgovor korisniku/ci @gottapatchemall
and telling other people that they aren't a scientist based on whether or not they fit your image of what a scientist looks like is lame af
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
🔬 ian🕷 25. srp
Odgovor korisniku/ci @gottapatchemall
But "Scientist" is a profession, so at the very least you'll need a basic amount of relevant training, and be living off doing science to some extent.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Naka 26. srp
Odgovor korisniku/ci @pseudonoma
I don't think all scientists are professional scientists. A lot of undergraduates do research without being paid but many of them are great scientists. That said, probably anybody working as a researcher in a lab *should* be paid, but that's a whole other can of worms
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Naka 26. srp
Odgovor korisniku/ci @gottapatchemall
I'm really glad this resonated with people. obligatory: check out this soundcloud (not mine, the work of friend and extremely talented scientist/artist ben shababo)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Toviah Moldwin 25. srp
Odgovor korisniku/ci @gottapatchemall
Does anyone actually use the scientific method? Does 'the scientific method' actually exist? Most scientists I know don't follow any sort of algorithm when doing research.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Naka 26. srp
Odgovor korisniku/ci @TMoldwin
I don't think of it as an algorithm... Sometimes we show kids diagrams like this that present it as a serial process and I definitely agree that science very rarely works like this
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"