Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Glenn Kirschner 2. velj
1. AG Barr’s DOJ says we can’t prosecute a criminal president. So it’s beyond dispute that the president IS above our criminal laws. 2. McConnell blocked all incriminating witnesses, documents & evidence from being used in the Senate impeachment hearing (don’t call it a “trial”).
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Glenn Kirschner
In a very real sense, McConnell’s “no witnesses” rule means we can’t impeach a criminal president. So, the president IS above the impeachment clause of the Constitution. And now, 3. The Supreme Court will decide if We The People will get to see ...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Glenn Kirschner 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @glennkirschner2
Trump’s tax returns & financial documents to determine if he’s committed tax crimes & financial fraud (as Michael Cohen testified he did). If SCOTUS rules in favor of Trump, allowing him to hide from the people the evidence of his financial and tax crimes ...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Glenn Kirschner 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @glennkirschner2
Trump will also be above our civil laws. If he is above our criminal laws thanks to Barr, above impeachment thanks to McConnell and above our civil laws thanks to SCOTUS, Trump will have hit the trifecta of dictatorship. And our republic will be lost.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Angrywhitebitch 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @glennkirschner2
So it’s hopeless 😩
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Glenn Kirschner 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @polidan_sharon
Not hopeless. We reform and rebuild come Inauguration Day, Jan. 2021.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
CopterDoctor 🇮🇪🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇺🇸 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @glennkirschner2
The founding fathers never could’ve imagined: 1. A self serving narcissist like Trump would ever be elected president 2. A power hungry senate majority leader who puts party over country 3. An Attorney General who believes in unlimited Presidential power 4. A Partisan SCOTUS
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mary E Rudman 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Lyramydog @glennkirschner2
68 million people saw it and “It” still got elected😑
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Peter Kohan 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @glennkirschner2
Given the Chief Justice’s somnambulant performance during the impeachment trial, why should I expect fairly standard legal norms to be upheld when it comes to any of the cases about to come before it regarding the President.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
John Jenkins 2. velj
Think Gore v Bush and Citizens United!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Keith Lucken 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @glennkirschner2 @MtuellJudy
To borrow from Madam Speaker Pelosi, the founding fathers did not foresee a president owning all three branches of government. That's clearly what's happened here. Welcome to jungle.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
steve 🇺🇸🌊🇺🇸🌊 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @glennkirschner2 @janrobinjackson
Maybe we need a new Senate and AG.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"