Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Frank Bowman
Law professor, criminal lawyer, legal historian. Author of "High Crimes & Misdemeanors: A History of Impeachment for the Age of Trump" (Cambridge U Press 2019)
558
Tweetovi
423
Pratim
1.426
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Frank Bowman 1 h
My interview with Bloomberg about CJ Roberts' declination to break ties, the sheepish justifications of Republican senators, and other issues raised as the impeachment trial winds down.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman 2 h
Alan Dershowitz finds himself thrust into academe's margins
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman 3 h
Great work from — Trump’s Most Dangerous Impeachment Trial Defense - Slate
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman 4 h
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman 7 h
Honored to see my book, "High Crimes & Misdemeanors," reviewed very kindly (along w/ Brenda Wineapple's great book on the Johnson impeachment) in Times Literary Supplement (TLS).
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman proslijedio/la je tweet
Laurence Tribe 1. velj
Proud to have signed this letter
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman 1. velj
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman 1. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @RyanWad56997981
I’m thinking about that now. Pretty sure I’ll do one or the other, and maybe both. Stay tuned.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman 1. velj
BTW, I understand that scholars' letter to Senate will have exactly zero effect on outcome of this trial. It's really a letter to history, placing in the trial record the consensus among serious scholars and historians about what "high crimes and misdemeanors" means. That matters
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman 1. velj
The most recent version of the scholar's letter to the Senate rebutting the constitutional theories of Pres Trump's counsel is linked in this piece. It now bears about 300 signatures, including many of the luminaries of American legal scholarship.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman 31. sij
Read the scholars letter rebutting constitutional arguments made by Trump lawyers. Many more signatories have joined since this version posted in several hrs ago.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @BillWright17
It would be nice. Sadly, not holding my breath...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman 30. sij
Dershowitz stood in well of Senate & argued tht president is king who can do no wrong in service of remaining on his throne. At any previous pt in American history, he wld have been jeered off floor. Possibly ducked in Potomac. Republicans shook his hand. I despair for my country
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman 29. sij
The mechanics of an impeachment are left up to the Senate, says U of Missouri Law School professor via
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @2probb
Very kind of you to say this.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman 29. sij
Thread by : 1/6 Oh, for the love of heaven, claims all the (innumerable) critics of his expressed views on impeachment honded only with "epithets" and not on the merits. I respectfully invite his attention to the entries on the follo…
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman proslijedio/la je tweet
Diane Rehm: On My Mind 28. sij
"This categorical refusal is without precedent or legal justification." - in . He was a recent guest on the podcast:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman 28. sij
Thx to for including me in this analysis: Would Roberts Need to Recuse in Any Trump Suit Challenging Bolton? via
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman proslijedio/la je tweet
Georgetown Law 28. sij
OPINION | "Trump’s Defense Against Subpoenas Makes No Legal Sense" "This is malarkey thinly draped with plausible-sounding distortions of facts, rules, court opinions, and the Constitution itself," writes in :
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Frank Bowman 28. sij
Thx to for including me in this WSJ story -- If the Senate calls John Bolton as a witness and the president blocks him, that would plunge the impeachment trial into uncharted legal territory. via
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"