Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
David Fendrich
Programmer, data scientist, AI aficionado. CTO of . Plays too much chess.
3.127
Tweetovi
265
Pratim
199
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
David Fendrich 11 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @hillelogram
Apparently nobody can stop you from gratuitously inserting a blank line between open...: and f.write either, you monster!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 5. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @CodeWisdom
Also with requirements and design.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Possessionista @geekwithabeak
Yeah. Maybe the kid's screen time too.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 31. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @jwangARK @jeremyphoward
But now they do Jax, which is really getting the early adopter love. Especially in the Pyro-community.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 31. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SethAbramson
It will be a surprise twist when it turns out that those who vote against witnesses do so because they think the evidence is already enough for conviction and the Senate should just get on with it.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @galaxy_map
I guess this is no surprise, but Wolfram Alpha answers 0.8 kpc: Perhaps using data from Wikipedia.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 30. sij
I just published a post on which machine learning methods we use (for our diverse set of projects and customers) in practice at Tenfifty:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 27. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @ESYudkowsky
I guess liberal failure modes (or crapholes) would be where other people's freedom infringe on mine, so anarchy and tragedy of the commons. Those can perhaps be equally bad, but would probably look different from the authoritarian failures.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 25. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @OHaggstrom @FilosofenNils i 2 ostali
Vintern är lite som vissa politiker på det sättet. Hör du en groda en gång är det inte så mycket att bråka om. Problemet är när det blir ett mönster.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 24. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @MsdJ29 @ESYudkowsky
As have I. No emails whatsoever.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 22. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @chessninja @MollyMcKew
That's the real key to a secure computer. Make the enemy too scared of the depravity they will find.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 21. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @hardmaru
Inaccessible to as many people as possible.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 19. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @piasprong
Not Carlson :)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 18. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Startup_Dreams @spakhm
A good future? An interesting one at least. Not dystopian.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 17. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @spakhm
Hannu Rajaniemi's Thief-novels are similar in style (best current SF writer) but speaks of a very different future, not the near term.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 16. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Pinboard @_Ben_Franklin1
Really, society is to blame.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 16. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @DanielKingChess @TarjeiJS
It doesn't mean that you cannot beat him. Except for the last 112 classical games or so.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @fpawn @GMHikaru @TarjeiJS
Bloodgood? Really? Imagine writing a book about a murderer who's good at chess and trying to get that name past your editor.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 11. sij
I agree, but I don't know how much people value risk to life in other practical situations. I expect it is relative to personal wealth and varies wildly between risk types.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
David Fendrich 11. sij
According to this calculation, the absolute increase in risk of death is 0.19%:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"