Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Fate Of Twist
IDK, THIS
3.955
Tweetovi
255
Pratim
731
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Fate Of Twist 24. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @11kilobytes
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 14. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mormo_music
oh, it's a thread, and I give a method for manifesting that instability
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 14. sij
being on this account feels so cursed since i switched to another alt...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 14. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mormo_music
Which is "the last clause"? Can you link it? Second recommendation is good, and I think I realised I should be doing something like that somewhere in there.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 8. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @yslorent
tobogganing in the mountains, then snow shoeing in the mountains, then cross country skiing in the mountains
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 8. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @vgr
for like 99.9% of the population, it is immoral to have opinions on this
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 24. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eigenrobot
sometimes shit happens
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 20. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Fulmenius1
/3 but what does this have to do with /scientific/ realism? What does this even mean to you?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 20. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Fulmenius1
2/ If you're analysing something like the nature of reality, something we have an intimate understanding of in the ordinary everyday, your analysis should stay close to the phenomenology of this understanding, rather than running off to something completely unrelated and contrary
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 20. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Fulmenius1
1/ Well, there is no one simple method. But some heuristics, which EY fails is that it should have explanatory power, it should be rigorous, it should be consistent.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 19. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FateOfTwist_
This is also a clever ploy to get you to read this :^) (^: :^)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 19. stu
Gosh my writing is so stodgy and lectury, maybe talking down, a hint of almost sanctimony? I'd like to change it. Your reflections on how this comes off to you, tone, would be nice. Either replied here or DMs (preferably not in reply to other threads)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 19. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FateOfTwist_
Here's a general positive take on ontology
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 19. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FateOfTwist_
If your conception of an absolute world was based on scientific theory in some sense, then I would recommend reading this
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 19. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FateOfTwist_
I'm not sure who exactly to point to for literature on this conception of science. Neopragmatists and scientific practice people are all good. (later) Putnam and van Fraassen are good. Hasok Chang is good but needs more than a pinch of salt
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 19. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FateOfTwist_
The person to read for this is Heidegger, and that's where I got much of this from
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 19. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FateOfTwist_
> Science can easily block you from [having a more complete ontology], if your conception of ontology is purely scientific.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 19. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FateOfTwist_
Science can easily block you from doing this, if your conception of ontology is purely scientific. > Science can talk about almost anything, but it can only talk about them in a very narrow set of ways
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 19. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FateOfTwist_
The sense of ontology which tries to be as broad and all encompassing as possible should seek to capture all of that, and more.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Fate Of Twist 19. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FateOfTwist_
These are not all just factual but also practical. They are not contradictory but complementary, but also in a sense partially exclusive in that the apple can't be all of that at once simultaneously for you.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"