Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
evelyn douek
Aussie struggling with °F and online speech issues. SJD Words Affiliate RT=endorsement of all possible interpretations
1.126
Tweetovi
678
Pratim
1.301
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
evelyn douek proslijedio/la je tweet
Bridget Barrett 24 h
Google's political advertising policy now has to break out UK election ads from EU election ads. :(
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek 2. velj
Great thread and you should read it, not least because it makes the tennis analogy I gave in my recent piece on Facebook's Oversight Board () seem _very_ deep.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek proslijedio/la je tweet
emptywheel 1. velj
Wonders what is doing with her day.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek 31. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Klonick @lawfarepodcast @alexstamos
Oh no! There's a reason I do audio only!! I didn't do my hair! (I never do my hair.)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek 31. sij
This was so good. Thanks for writing it!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek 31. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @zittrain
Thanks for including me!! Also making me reevaluate. Normally I feel the need to write something up as a proper blog post or paper for posterity, if I want people to read it later, and only write twitter threads if I don't have time. ... Can tweet storms be used in job packets?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek 31. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Klonick
Thanks 😊😊_This_ is so kind! Not sure about wisdom, but camaraderie is a thing I can do!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek 31. sij
Facebook to do more about coronavirus misinformation. That's good! I hope efforts are matched w/ transparency so we (& by 'we', I mean researchers much smarter than me) can learn more abt how this stuff spreads and what to do abt it proactively & offline
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek proslijedio/la je tweet
Ramya Krishnan 31. sij
Government censors have far too much power over how much the public will see of Bolton's memoir, and when they will see it. Op-ed by and me in the
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @rly_y @qjurecic i 3 ostali
Thanks! We had the same thought this week:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek 30. sij
Sad reason to have an Australia podcast -- but I hope you'll give it a listen. It's an interesting case study in what is going to be an ongoing problem, and has lots of insight that goes well beyond this particular disaster
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek proslijedio/la je tweet
Jacob Schulz 30. sij
The House Ethics Committee has had enough of members tweeting deep fakes. My take on the new Ethics guidelines with and
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek proslijedio/la je tweet
Quinta "Pro Quo" Jurecic 30. sij
A story about how information is disseminated and the role of gatekeepers: •John Roberts won't read Rand Paul's question •RP goes out and reads it to a group of reporters—and, as far as I can tell, gets very little mainstream coverage •RP tweets the question out
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @sivavaid @mathewi @shannimcg
For the same reason it's doing this whole thing, I suppose. The Board is a bid for legitimacy -- and it will lose its bet if it doesn't follow through.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mathewi @shannimcg
Thanks for reading! Although for the record, while I generally favor incrementalism, I think the limitation of only being able to challenge take-downs (and not leave-ups) at start up is a blunder that will skew the work of the board, and I hope it's rectified soon
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @cameronwilson
😊 thanks!! Casey's newsletter is an essential part of my workflow, so it's a real honor. Loving all your work btw! Thank you & keep it up
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek proslijedio/la je tweet
Javier Pallero 30. sij
Super duper thread on Facebook's Oversight Board
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @javierpallero @daphnehk
yeah, this got split off at some point but that was my understanding too
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @daphnehk
That's such a great point. I guess the q is, fundamentally, what is the Board? A counterweight to this previous trend, to protect more speech? Or a new institution to help make content moderation rules better more generally? Guess we're gonna find out!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
evelyn douek 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @daphnehk
But to me that's still not a good enough excuse. Legal systems have dealt with anonymized cases for ages. It's not a big enough hurdle to justify slanting the entirety of the board's work.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"