|
@eriktorenberg | |||||
|
See recent critique of billionaires for not solving climate crisis.
US Gov't has over 4 trillion dollars (collected via taxes vs created via growth).
What's better use for public $ than solving climate change?
The more ppl become rich, the more money gov't has to do so. pic.twitter.com/5WaTvbKefa
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Erik Torenberg
@eriktorenberg
|
21 h |
|
Someone DM’ed me & said defend billionaires in 2 tweets. Took 3. Curious for your critique or own version (obv generalized):
Business ppl (mostly) grow the pie. Gov’t (mostly) splits it (grows some too)
W/o business ppl growing pie, there’s less to split
twitter.com/eriktorenberg/…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Erik Torenberg
@eriktorenberg
|
21 h |
|
When ppl get rich in a sustainable way, ppl should celebrate, b/c, among other reasons, some of that $ goes to gov’t, which means more education & healthcare
Without growth, we couldn’t pay for these services. Each public job is in effect “sponsored” by a private job (via taxes)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Erik Torenberg
@eriktorenberg
|
21 h |
|
One thing I'd add is I'm surprised when pro-government fans don't want people to become billionaires as long as they are creating sustainable value (e.g JK Rowling)...
It means more money for the gov't!
|
||
|
|
||
|
Erik Torenberg
@eriktorenberg
|
21 h |
|
Another addition: There are 2 distinct kinds of billionaire complaints:
Those that think the $ would be better off distributed more widely among employees & public directly +those that think the gov't should be collecting the money & dispersing it itself
twitter.com/eriktorenberg/…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Tomas Pueyo
@tomaspueyo
|
18 h |
|
This is a great defense of the rich. Not billionaires. The pbm is not the rich. It’s the order of magnitude of billionaire wealth.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Erik Torenberg
@eriktorenberg
|
18 h |
|
How? Can you outline the argument?
|
||
|
|
||