Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Erik Torenberg 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg
Indeed: There are lots of VCs who could make great founders, who would actually prefer to build a business than do a financial services job, but they just prefer the economic calculus of venture capital. Others, to be sure, are unwilling or incapable of building a great biz.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Erik Torenberg 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg
The average founder may have a good outcome, but we need to make the median under have a better outcome. How? Diversification VC firms can give upside in portfolio, or VC founders can become scouts, or they should engage in founder pooling activities. (Employees too, ideally)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Erik Torenberg 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg
To be sure, there are many bottlenecks besides risk—perceived career risk, fear of failure, mental health, to name a few—and even within economic risk, founder pooling is just one solution. Visas, health insurance, cheap housing, child care are others.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Erik Torenberg 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg
I think we should be doing everything possible we can to unlock more great founders. How many people are out there who, if they started a company (or a few companies), could create the next $1b company? 100s? 1000s? VCs far smarter than I disagree here on several grounds
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Erik Torenberg 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg
#1 They'd prefer some barriers They think that "security" is inversely correlated w/ success. There is some truth to this (which is why we don't give big founder salaries) There is probably a Laffer-esque Curve for security & likelihood of success, but we're not close to it IMO
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Erik Torenberg 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg
They think founder diversification will mean less "all-in" from the founders This thread best demonstrates the sentiment I'm sympathetic to it, but don't think we're close to the point on this Laffer Curve—we can allow some diversification w/o sacrifice
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Erik Torenberg 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg
#2 They don't buy that they're are great founders out there held back. If they need the support/encouragement to start, how will they scale? I'd equate it to Military: Many great soldiers "stumbled" into war & made it their mission once they got there, but they needed the push
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Erik Torenberg 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg
In terms of there incentives, wouldn't you think VCs want more founders? Maybe not. They’ll only invest in a handful of cos a year, and those cos will hire 1000s of ppl — they want great talent to join them. Their advice is often “join a break out series A or Series B company”
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Erik Torenberg 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @villageglobal
#3 Founder Pooling has never worked. Why would it work now? Fair enough! I'd suggest it hasn't really been tried. Maybe it won't, but there are other ways to diversify. E.g. Angel/Scout investing hasn't seemed to hurt founders chances of success (cc )
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Erik Torenberg 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg
In conclusion, IMO: - We're suffering from founder scarcity, partially evidenced by rising valuations - We should systematically remove bottlenecks to starting cos - We can incentivize more founders by making median founder outcome closer to avg & by removing economic friction
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Erik Torenberg
We also should decrease cultural friction to starting companies: - celebrate starting cos as a thing for ambitious ppl to do globally - see startup failures on resumes as badges of honor instead of blemishes - create communities to find co-founders & founder support()
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Erik Torenberg 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @BurakYngn @david__booth
Would love to hear thoughts & feedback. h/t and for conversations on the topic.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Julie Fredrickson 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg @beondeck
IMO biggest major expense I struggled with early in my founder career was health insurance and it being tied to employment. I went without for years (to my detriment) in order to be a serial founder
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sachit Gupta 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @AlmostMedia @eriktorenberg i 3 ostali
Agree! Worse was being 24 and told I shouldn't even apply because of a pre-existing condition (shoulder dislocation). Then dislocating shoulder 2x in 1 year. It ended up being cheaper for me to fly to India to get surgery than get treated in the US
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Usman Shabbir 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg @beondeck
I think another barrier is just switching cost from being an employee to being a founder. Many projects stay in passion projects phase and then die off because potential founders don’t see a practical path in terms of income + benefits (specifically ones with no safety net)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Usman Shabbir 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg @beondeck
One approach would be for VC firms to start EIR sort of programs that pays opportunity/switching cost, which can later be recouped. Currently such programs are few and only focused on second, third time founders
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dougal Adamson 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg @beondeck i 2 ostali
A lot of this aligns with what is trying to do. Particularly the point on ambitious ppl. See podcast this week on Invest like the Best
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
JG 🦁 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg @beondeck
These are great thoughts! I think the tl;dr would be: “We should systematically start removing bottlenecks to starting companies.” I believe any shortage of talent to be directly correlated to either: A) process friction B) process ignorance
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Adam Paigge 16. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg @beondeck
Strong. Lots of things here I wish had been available to me starting my first business. Would start again if I had a reasonable wage and some safety net to bail out if both parties agreed it was time.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Patt-tom McDonnell 15. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg @beondeck
startup failure will always be a badge of honour in my book, actually failure of any kind that’s noteworthy enough to get put on the resume is
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Ingrid Green 16. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @pthm_ @eriktorenberg @beondeck
Intriguing notion. Most immigrants and overlooked founders disagree.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"