Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Eric Wall IS RIGHT
CIO info@arcaneassets.io // privacy // prev cryptocurrency lead () // PGP: 7D36 55BF E37D 6053 3083 21EA FB7D 3D66 0EA5 E0B7
9.614
Tweetovi
2.153
Pratim
27.312
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Eric Wall IS RIGHT 2 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @JimmyRagosa @Consensys
That's not why I circled it, I circled it because I thought given your role you should be knowledgeable enough to understand the scenario I was describing :)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT 21 h
So glad someone is funding this!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT 23 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Ethan_Heilman
👏👏
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT 5. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @kixunil @danielwingen @TusharJain_
Tons of issues with this approach: - Who makes this transaction? - Which guarantees do you have that the timelock is renewed properly? - What about additional revenue streams that make it into the DAOs control? - n-of-n multisig
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT proslijedio/la je tweet
Rhythm 5. velj
The best explanation of why we need bitcoin in single minute.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @danielwingen @TusharJain_
It's true you can have a DAO, but it's also true the Bitcoin DAO can't do everything one may want. For instance, you wouldn't be able to encode a simple thing such as a rule into the Bisq DAO that enforces a monthly spending limit that cannot be overriden by BSQ token holders.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @der_muXxer
Thank you! 28 comments to that tweet and no one even thought to read what it said. What a ride.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT proslijedio/la je tweet
muXxer 4. velj
Hi ! You are absolutely right, all these claims are wrong regarding the current main net. We are working hard as a community to improve the technology, but it will take time. I don't understand the toxic reactions of some community members regarding your tweet.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @marcandu @mayazi @AaveAave
But now you're just talking about what essentially amounts to transaction batching cost savings?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mayazi @AaveAave
How does help you avoid fees?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @iotahawaii @accretionist i 2 ostali
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT 4. velj
Thanks. It is very refreshening and enlightening to hear your takes on the Ethereum ecosystem.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT 4. velj
You mean opt-in upgradeability?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT 4. velj
Good point! When you say "restrict", things that come to mind are e.g. time delays and withdrawal limits. Even contracts that use oracles/admin keys can be made to have to abide by such restrictions. It's impossible to guarantee such restrictions via open APIs to central systems!
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT 4. velj
I did build some stuff! And I am building.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT 4. velj
Just so I know for the future, how long should it take from the moment I predict a thing until it happens for it to count? If it's 3 years, it seems like it's "old news and backbiting", so what should I aim for? Should I focus only on things I can prove within 1-2 years? 🤔
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT proslijedio/la je tweet
00xou 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @00xou
A few people are considering the possibility that maybe just maybe David may have scammed investors
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @ricburton @CryptoCatVC @MakerDAO
The mgmt fee is paid out because the fund manager is providing investors with exposure, not because they're voting excellently. It's just logical from the investor's perspective to proxy their votes to the actor who made the allocation. It's not what they're primarily paying for.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @ricburton @CryptoCatVC @MakerDAO
You conflate shareholder voting & wealth mgmt. If I have USD deposited with a fund, I am paying fees to the fund because they're managing my USD in *other assets*. But if I'm a shareholder, I don't proxy my vote to some other guy at the shareholder meeting for a 1% fee. ZzZz
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eric Wall IS RIGHT 4. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @ricburton @CryptoCatVC @MakerDAO
No, shareholders do not pay management fees of 0.1-1% to delegate their vote to some representative in shareholder votes.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"