Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Emily Badger
New York Times writer covering urban policy for . Outdoor lover. emily.badger [at]
4.021
Tweetovi
1.398
Pratim
34.566
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Emily Badger 1 min
Odgovor korisniku/ci @DeAngelisCorey @alexanderrusso
Your point about distinguishing between charters and traditional public schools is well-taken. But I'm still not clear on whether your view is that "the public" is always just a euphemism for "government."
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger 3 min
Odgovor korisniku/ci @DeAngelisCorey @alexanderrusso
To pick up some of your points: My local public pool doesn't freely let in non-D.C. residents (they have to pay). In fact, it won't let you in at all if it's full. Is it not a public pool because of that? Public roads come w/ extensive gov't regulations. Are they not public?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger proslijedio/la je tweet
Nate Cohn 2 h
Early analysis of turnout by caucus site shows a very clear trend: lower turnout than '16 in less educated areas and an increase in well-educated areas, likely reflecting the Trump era realignment in Iowa and elsewhere
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger 7 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @DeAngelisCorey
Thanks for the replies. Do you think there is no such thing as "the public" or the "the commons"? I'm trying to parse specific arguments about "public schools" (as being not truly accessible/equitable to the public) and conceptual arguments about "the public" (it is a fiction).
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger proslijedio/la je tweet
Rebekah Sanderlin 17 h
Can I tell you what a military reunion is really like? I’ve been through a bunch. I’m the SME. You wait. You worry. You haven’t seen this person in months. Maybe even a year. So much has happened in that year. You want - desperately- with every cell in your body, for it to be a
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger proslijedio/la je tweet
Blair Kamin 8 h
This piece makes clear that the critic Catesby Leigh is 100 percent behind the push to mandate classicism as the preferred federal style and is perhaps its leading proponent. Blinded by ideology, he even disses Mies’ Federal Center.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger proslijedio/la je tweet
John Leibovitz 8 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @emilymbadger @juliebosman
There has been a decades-long war on the very American (and distinct from “socialist”) notion of the “public”. The Democratic candidate who recognizes this and finds the right words to talk about it will be in a stronger position come November.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger 8 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @juliebosman
"The right has been more successful than the left at framing issues related to abortion, health care, labor unions and the concept of government itself, among other issues, with carefully contrived catchphrases: 'Tax relief.' 'Pro-life.' 'The Democrat Party.' 'Death panels.'"
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger 8 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @juliebosman
A great story on this language from 2016: Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan used the phrase in 1978 to make the case for federal aid to private schools. “We have succeeded in providing equality only to those who enroll in government schools.”
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger proslijedio/la je tweet
jasoncherkis 8 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @emilymbadger @CitizenCohn
It made me think of this story
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger proslijedio/la je tweet
Anne Lutz Fernandez 8 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @emilymbadger
government police government fire and rescue government military
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger 8 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @emilymbadger
The president knows what he's doing here. If you act like these assets aren't provided for and by the public, you depress public support for them. Imagine: Government transit.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger 8 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @emilymbadger
Of course not. Because "public" means "belongs to the public," or "for the public good." What happens if politicians start emphasizing instead that they're "run by the government"?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger 8 h
I can't stop thinking about "government schools." Do we have government parks government libraries government pools government streets government space government rights of way government plazas government concerts ?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger proslijedio/la je tweet
Paul Goldberger 23 h
Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s “Guiding Principles” for Federal architecture, which have prevailed for decades, state that design should flow from the architecture profession to the government, not the other way around. As usual, Moynihan was succinct and eloquent.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger proslijedio/la je tweet
Erica L. Green 20 h
“Government school.” Interesting (and I anticipate deliberate) shift in rhetoric....
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger proslijedio/la je tweet
Margot Sanger-Katz 20 h
The president’s claim (in speech excerpts) that he “will always protect patients with pre-existing conditions” is false.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger proslijedio/la je tweet
Kevin Quealy 23 h
Why might a candidate lead in one measure in Iowa but not in others? Yesterday's has the answer.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger proslijedio/la je tweet
Nate Cohn 4. velj
NYT results page. Take two.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Emily Badger proslijedio/la je tweet
Michael Kimmelman 4. velj
The move traffics in Trumpian authoritarianism but it's also bait guaranteed to rile up those of us who support the sort of architecture, and architectural diversity, that Trump's base thinks epitomizes loopy leftist elitism. Our outrage plays to his base. Win-win for him.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"