Twitter | Search | |
Elon Musk
This is nothing. In a few years, that bot will move so fast you’ll need a strobe light to see it. Sweet dreams…
Reply Retweet Like More
Bigger Than Moses Nov 27
I see. There's a lot to figure out.
Reply Retweet Like
Haider Bahrani Nov 27
Replying to @elonmusk
So many remain in haze of disbelief regards what's coming. Going to hit them like a steam train.
Reply Retweet Like
Virgin Media Nov 27
Replying to @tonay_win
Hi Tonay, how are your services running today? ^ KB
Reply Retweet Like
Benjamin McIntire Nov 27
Replying to @elonmusk
The AI wars of 2027 won't be fought by humanoid bots. AI based infrastructure hacking/security will be the only frontier that matters as long as the world stays connected.
Reply Retweet Like
merry christms-13 Nov 27
Replying to @elonmusk @Gloryless
That's still counts as "seeing it"
Reply Retweet Like
hatice Nov 27
Replying to @elonmusk
What about us? I believe in neurolink ☺️❤️
Reply Retweet Like
Φρειδερίκος Nov 27
Replying to @elonmusk
MASTER,
Reply Retweet Like
Ton Aarts Nov 27
Replying to @Gloryless @elonmusk
Otherwise you won't see all those Tesla's being built. Just like you don't now.
Reply Retweet Like
Phil Jennerjahn Nov 27
Replying to @elonmusk
Great. Robot soldiers in few years. Then .
Reply Retweet Like
♠ Milan ❤️ Nov 27
Replying to @elonmusk @Gloryless
like this Chris 😬 👉
Reply Retweet Like
Lou™ Nov 27
Replying to @elonmusk @Strange_G
But we'll all be in self diving cars and should be able to get awa ... Oh no wait that thing driving the car is a robot?
Reply Retweet Like
Ton Aarts Nov 27
Replying to @Gloryless @elonmusk
Oh, and I'm not suggesting Elon is desperately trying to distract here. Or that anyone should check out these 134 examples of how 'advanced' Tesla is. Nope.
Reply Retweet Like
Ton Aarts Nov 27
Just like these 134 examples that's blasphemy. How dare you ..
Reply Retweet Like
Pim Stoit Nov 27
Replying to @elonmusk @RobotBrush
How can the guy that believes it he can easily send people to Mars be such a pessimist regarding robotics and/or A.I.
Reply Retweet Like
Brian Lockett Nov 27
For totality. WE die, so we need, and, by extension, we want. No algorithm's possible for want (a byproduct of need) in machines, because there's no death for machines. Only human parameters. A.I. can never be anything but codified human hubris, hoping to fool ourselves.
Reply Retweet Like
Brian Lockett Nov 27
It can't outlive humanity, because it can't "live" to start with. That's truly my whole point, honestly. A.I. is just emulation of human life. It isn't replication of human life. We live and we die, and all our sense of need and want is based on it. A.I. is a cold emulation.
Reply Retweet Like
Jo Diddley 🎄 Nov 27
It will exist long after carbon life forms...if only digitally...as a "cloud"...immortal
Reply Retweet Like
CheekyMonkeyLA Nov 27
In the desert no one can hear you scream. Wait. In the desert you can remember your name 'cause there ain't no one for to give you no pain.
Reply Retweet Like
CheekyMonkeyLA Nov 27
Replying to @CJHandmer @elonmusk
This was too much for me.
Reply Retweet Like