Twitter | Search | |
Emily Willingham🏁
This assertion disturbs me. For the record, this is *not* how all 'experts in science' act. Good Lord.
Reply Retweet Like More
Notorious KGB Aggie 7 Sep 15
Your science journalism disturbed me. So Wrong on GMO Science
Reply Retweet Like
Notorious KGB Aggie 7 Sep 15
I think you need to brush up on journalism ethics ...Your GMO pieces are biased & untrue
Reply Retweet Like
Notorious KGB Aggie 7 Sep 15
Inaccurate, misleading unscientific GMO journalism. What happened to journo ethics?
Reply Retweet Like
Notorious KGB Aggie 7 Sep 15
I think accurate journalism is vital to a functioning democracy. Don't u? I'm ready to talk GMO Science
Reply Retweet Like
Notorious KGB Aggie 7 Sep 15
Why is the study that triggered Seralini never mentioned?
Reply Retweet Like
Notorious KGB Aggie 7 Sep 15
Is there ANY evidence at all for BPA being the causative agent? Any data at all or just wild guessing?
Reply Retweet Like
Notorious KGB Aggie 7 Sep 15
Reply Retweet Like
Notorious KGB Aggie 7 Sep 15
Vapid snark doesn't answer my questions. Check out 's Tweet:
Reply Retweet Like
Notorious KGB Aggie 7 Sep 15
Hint: The study that's never ever never ever never mentioned is a Monsanto study.
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Vance 7 Sep 15
He rec'd a travel grant. Scientists solicit/receive grants all the time.
Reply Retweet Like
Emily Willingham🏁 7 Sep 15
You don't say. Now splain to me abt what scientists do 'all the time' abt disclosing
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Vance 7 Sep 15
When a grant is used for research purposes, it's disclosed in the published study.
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Vance 7 Sep 15
In this case, I'm not sure what the protocol is or if there is 1.
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Vance 7 Sep 15
His outreach was the same before/ after the travel grant, though, which says a lot.
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Vance 7 Sep 15
BTW, it's a grant. He's under no contractual obligation to carry a particular mssg.
Reply Retweet Like
Emily Willingham🏁 7 Sep 15
This is on point in re repeated assertions of no relationship in what way, exactly?
Reply Retweet Like
Sam Vance 7 Sep 15
No relationship to his research. His outreach isn't a part of the research he does.
Reply Retweet Like
Notorious KGB Aggie 7 Sep 15
Which is the worse of two evils..the defendant or accused ? 's Tweet:
Reply Retweet Like
Notorious KGB Aggie 7 Sep 15
Umm isn't guilty of confirmation bias... ? from where I sit both are epic hypocrites.
Reply Retweet Like