Twitter | Search | |
Max Cantor 14 Sep 12
Hey just interpret the line as it was intended: self deprecating humor about how us haskellers are just not an attractive group
Reply Retweet Favorite
Tim Chevalier
. I find many Haskellers quite attractive. You don't?
Reply Retweet Favorite More
Caylee Hogg 14 Sep 12
...sorry what's the context of all this?
Reply Retweet Favorite
Tim Chevalier 14 Sep 12
He's just pulling the tired old "intent is fucking magic" cliche, which I already debunked:
Reply Retweet Favorite
Caylee Hogg 14 Sep 12
Oh dear....I hadn't heard about this yet.
Reply Retweet Favorite
Tim Chevalier 14 Sep 12
I don't really distinguish between "sexual"/"nonsexual" when it comes to people I'm attracted to, but anyway, it shouldn't matter...
Reply Retweet Favorite
Tim Chevalier 14 Sep 12
...since "attractive" is just not a word people should be using to describe their colleagues while speaking at a public conference
Reply Retweet Favorite
Max Cantor 15 Sep 12
simply stating that a claim (intent is irrelevant) is wrong doesn't constitute debunking said claim.
Reply Retweet Favorite
Tim Chevalier 15 Sep 12
this is nothing to do with right and wrong; it's about power and domination
Reply Retweet Favorite
Tim Chevalier 15 Sep 12
and, I mean, ideally, listening and learning... But I'm an idealist.
Reply Retweet Favorite
Tim Chevalier 15 Sep 12
anyway, I am not going to be governed by your intent even if you tell me I should be, so you might consider saving your breath
Reply Retweet Favorite