Twitter | Search | |
dreid Dec 14
I read it just fine.
Reply Retweet Like
glyph Dec 14
One might scratch a desperate message in blood. The message may be crucial; that doesn't recommend blood scratching as a medium.
Reply Retweet Like
dreid Dec 14
If you want to talk about how threads affect the comprehension of the reader that's a useful discussion to have.
Reply Retweet Like
dreid Dec 14
As evidenced by the fact that threading has improved drastically over the last decade of Twitter.
Reply Retweet Like
dreid Dec 14
But I'm not interested in arguing about how your self-admittedly restricted experience of Twitter as a medium is *better*.
Reply Retweet Like
dreid Dec 14
Threads are imperfect, but I'm not gonna try to hard to tell people how they should express themselves.
Reply Retweet Like
dreid Dec 14
Because frankly it is all starting to sound an awful lot like Ed Koch railing against Graffiti.
Reply Retweet Like
glyph Dec 14
That's a low blow and also totally missing the point. We're talking about billboards here, not graffiti.
Reply Retweet Like
dreid Dec 14
I am talking about people finding ways to speak. I don't really know what you're talking about anymore. The aesthetics of speech?
Reply Retweet Like
glyph Dec 14
Given the nature of speech, aesthetics are inseparable from mechanics. I'm talking about the consequences those mechanics have.
Reply Retweet Like
glyph Dec 14
One of the major consequences of the tweetstorm as a mechanism is increased urgency for the audience.
Reply Retweet Like
glyph Dec 14
In my post, I was talking about how obnoxious it is to use that increased urgency to tell me to enjoy delicious Slurm™
Reply Retweet Like
glyph Dec 14
You're talking about the same increased urgency to share desperately important social commentary.
Reply Retweet Like
glyph Dec 14
I think there are still problems there, but there's a reason I didn't come out of the gate critiquing that usage.
Reply Retweet Like
dreid Dec 14
You didn't acknowledge or engage with that usage either, which seems an awful lot like dismissing it.
Reply Retweet Like
dreid
And I think importantly, you came at it from a perspective of someone who does has admittedly self-disengaged with the medium.
Reply Retweet Like More
glyph Dec 14
Perhaps I'll add an edit to address this somehow. I don't want to dismiss it, but engaging with this properly is a _WAY_ longer piece
Reply Retweet Like
dreid Dec 14
🎶 isn't it ironic 🎶 that your blog post failed capture nuance 🎶
Reply Retweet Like
glyph Dec 14
okay the earlier Koch thing was below the belt but _that_ was a TKO
Reply Retweet Like
dreid Dec 14
I'm sorry I called you old and koch-ity.
Reply Retweet Like