Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Dan H
consider (free) supporting (donate monthly)
2.958
Tweetovi
228
Pratim
30
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Dan H proslijedio/la je tweet
Rep. Ilhan Omar 28. sij
If your “freedom” relies on my oppression, then neither of us are free.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H 30. sij
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H 30. sij
Antigone on Your Knee
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H 24. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @philipcball
like identity two: one square root of two or three exclusive points, excluding zero points; one square root of three or four exclusive points, excluding zero points; one square root of four-to-ei
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H 24. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @philipcball
suggesting: multiplication/division creates additional spatial context according to square root identities (as directional infinities, according to Cantor's correlative diagonals argument) = more (+) than (\sqrt{+-})
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H 24. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @ForeignAffairs @BrankoMilan
In terms of and the Something Deeply Hidden isn't Utopian or Protopian (or American, Ukrainian, Chinese, or My Religious History); it's Myopian :
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H 23. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @nowthisnews @AOC
however "more" (compared to zero) of it might get to along with the tech that "earned it"; "The future is already here, it's just not very evenly distributed."
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H 23. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @philipcball
is it philosophically unfit if not scientifically deniable that "exclusive predictions might direct additional behavior"? ... like halting at stop signals, and micro particles slowing down "before" cliffs? (Deep Down Things, Schumm); that would explain what will be as conserved
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H proslijedio/la je tweet
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez 23. sij
If you don’t have an economics degree like Greta, they’ll mock you for not having one. If you DO have one, as I do, they’ll claim it’s illegitimate. Haters gonna hate & deniers will deny. They will deny logic, science, and environmental consensus in order to protect oligarchy.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H proslijedio/la je tweet
Greta Thunberg 23. sij
My gap year ends in August, but it doesn’t take a college degree in economics to realise that our remaining 1,5° carbon budget and ongoing fossil fuel subsidies and investments don’t add up. 1/3
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H 22. sij
voting for Greta IRL
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H 22. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @philipcball
how do "Exclusive predictions" originate, like after breakfast if we're so lucky? predict the future in general, then "tell the truth" when comparing "theories of everything"
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H 22. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @philipcball
was she still "right"? ... "do nothing" vs "predict nothing": what's in that box? A) complete annihilation!! B) additional, inverse directions C) "empty space is not nothing" --Wilczek D) one square root of three exclusive points E) "the exigent demand is the square root" --Erwin
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H proslijedio/la je tweet
Philip Ball 21. sij
She's right. Time to do that now.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H 22. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @philipcball
I lied. All I'm suggesting is to differentiate between non-fiction and fiction "by identifying the first law of thermodynamics" denying it if you "will" but others would rather support
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H 22. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @philipcball
Sorry, this will be my last troll of the day; "how" can we speak of "infinities" without the "work" of (mental hospital patient) Georg Cantor? can the label "zero" be used to prioritize "supernatural subtraction"; how do disabled people understand "the time is now" and "more" (+)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H 22. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @philipcball
oops that should be "facts (plural)" and "fictions (plural); in other words as Joseph Campbell and Georg Cantor also "suggested": what alternating generic predictions (exclusive points) have in common is singular (total energy === total deniability, read Gödel vs Russell on "not"
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H 22. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @philipcball
A point "WILL be" created at A point in the past and destroyed at A point in the future; B point "WILL be" neither A point in the past nor A point in the future; "Proving" (QM): "thinking" differentiates between fact (thermo-meters) and fiction ("complete Energy annihilation")
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H 22. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @philipcball
Unbelievably yet exactly "how to disprove authoritarian solipsisms ..." (in support of and Christof Koch's next, even less autobiographical === exclusive predictions between "additional" observations, excluding "zero points ..."
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan H 21. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Sci_Phile
A point "WILL be" created at A point in the past and destroyed at A point in the future; B point "WILL be" neither A point in the past nor A point in the future; "Proving" (QM): "thinking" differentiates between fact (thermo-meters) and fiction ("complete Energy annihilation")
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"