|
@cziscience | |||||
|
#Opensource software is essential to science—that’s why we’re supporting 42 open source tools that accelerate biomedical research and serve the larger community. Learn about the grantees bit.ly/34YhzX1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
CZI Science
@cziscience
|
14. stu |
|
We believe in the importance of rewarding the creators of the often invisible but critical computational infrastructure for science. Read about what we learned from the first cycle of our Essential #OpenSource #Software for Science RFA bit.ly/2Xe1IkM
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ralf Gommers
@ralfgommers
|
15. stu |
|
The vision and broad scope of this program is awesome, thank you @cziscience.
Very excited about the NumPy and OpenBLAS funding we received! I wrote a blog post about it at labs.quansight.org/blog/2019/11/n…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ian Mulvany
@IanMulvany
|
14. stu |
|
This is fantastic, l love that pip is on the list. Also someone should give guido van Rossum a breakthrough prize for contributions to science.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Beth Cimini
@BoSoxBioBeth
|
14. stu |
|
A great list, excited for all the winners!
|
||
|
|
||
|
Matthew Rocklin
@mrocklin
|
14. stu |
|
Thank you for your continued support of open source scientific infrastructure!
|
||
|
|
||
|
darya filippova
@lynxoid
|
16. stu |
|
One could also envision a system of grants specifically geared toward support & further development of sci software.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Degui Zhi
@zhizhid
|
16. stu |
|
Congrats!
|
||
|
|
||
|
Barbara Engelhardt
@BeEngelhardt
|
15. stu |
|
It is true that there are only two women on this list of 42 project leaders?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Barbara Engelhardt
@BeEngelhardt
|
15. stu |
|
Google tells me I’m wrong— I see four women project leaders. Why is this?
|
||
|
|
||