Twitter | Search | |
Bill Cooney
4,059
Tweets
541
Following
378
Followers
Tweets
Bill Cooney Dec 11
A baby can scream, choke, vomit & pass out from the pain of his - but we're to think it's worth it b/c of pain from possible future infection? This isn't what most MDs think, and Jewish opinion is rightly turning against child circumcision.
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
Happy Birthday to "The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal, and to hasten the resurrection of the dead." It seems like we need him more today than ever.
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
It's not. There's nothing to "get."
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
It is just absurd for you to suggest that wine is an effective or appropriate analgesic for an unnecessary amputation of part of a child's penis. The international medical consensus is clear: the supposed prophylactic medical benefits of child cannot justify it.
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
Thanks for admitting you're unable to defend forcing on boys in the face of an objective, fact-based comparison of the practice with forcing on girls. You're right, there truly is no benefit to the nontherapeutic cutting children's genitals. It must end.
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
Do you? It's the structure that connects the foreskin with the rest of the penis and is always partially or totally destroyed with every You are clearly unfit to be a medical practitioner of any kind. @AmerNurse2Day
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
The foreskin is innervated. For you to say otherwise is utterly false. Do you honestly think all the world's foreskins are completely numb? By denying that, & suggesting foreskin can be "reattached" you only demonstrate you are as incompetent as you are unethical.
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
For someone who purports to be a nurse, your ignorance and callousness are shocking. Surgery to have a foreskin "put back on" isn't even possible, let alone "simple." Has something to do with the complexity of that anatomical structure of which you're unaware.
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
The fact that blood has a spike in ONE clotting factor on the eighth day does NOT mean that blood clots more easily on the eighth day. Boys cut on the eighth day can bleed to death as well as on any other day. You're a complete disgrace to nurses everywhere. @AmerNurse2Day
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
News flash: if "God" tells you to cut healthy body parts from a child, you're speaking with an imposter. The original covenant was in Genesis 15 & had no circumcision requirement. Only after the Babylonian captivity was circumcision added (& the story moved to Genesis 17).
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
If you'd been an intactivist for 12 years, you'd know that many Muslims & others sincerely believe forcing FGM on their daughters is a religious obligation for them, in the same way many Jews sincerely believe forcing on their sons is a religious obligation for them
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
Then it should be easy for you to explain - with specific references to his arguments - how the Yale bioethicist who compares & in this article gets it wrong: But of course, you won't be able to.
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
We believe everyone has the right to keep the healthy body parts they were born with. As it's the cutters who have chosen which body part to attack, they are the ones in the "pedocult." You'd have remembered that if you'd been an intactivist for 5 minutes, let alone 12 years.
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
Is the patient in that picture reading a comic book entitled "Moses' Journey"? Could those on their crusade to circumcise sub-Saharan Africa at least try to pretend it's not really all about their own cultural biases?
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
You use the "bias" label again have no basis for it. I don't know what you mean by "ethnics" but if you're suggesting that "science" should not be constrained by ETHICS then you could not be more wrong. Otherwise, we'd amputate breast tissue from all infants & end breast cancer.
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
As I've shown repeatedly, the worldwide consensus among physicians is that there is no good medical reason to circumcise a healthy child - that's based on MD research. When you saw an article by 38 such MDs making that point, you only baselessly accused them of antisemitism.
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
Is there a specific, credible reason for your conversion away from intactivism coming any time soon, or are you just going to continue making things up, not showing any evidence you were ever opposed to , not saying who would remember you & attacking Greta Tunberg?
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
To whom did you spread these "lies"? During what time period? Where are your emails, letters, social media posts? When did you "see the light" & repent of your intactivism? Didn't you tell everyone you'd been wrong, & get some surprised reactions? Where is all that?
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
You "know the science" but can't cite to or refute any of it - or even come close to getting it right. You think we're anti-semitic but can't point to a single instance of any intactivist actually being anti-semitic. Do you really have no idea how unconvincing your story is?
Reply Retweet Like
Bill Cooney Dec 11
You were an intactivist for 12 years - & have absolutely no proof of that. 🤣 No surprise there - you've absolutely no proof for anything you say. Who would remember you from that period of your life? ? Rosemary Romberg? Someone else?
Reply Retweet Like