|
@chrisdc77 | |||||
|
Imagine being the famous professor at a prestigious institution who feels comfortable writing this👇 in a manuscript review of an ECR's preregistered (non-RR) study
This is one of the reasons I believe professors should have to sign their reviews pic.twitter.com/YTkPMkGHv7
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Chris Crandall
@ChrisCrandall16
|
31. sij |
|
An example of what happens when one leaves the Twitter echo-verse. One needn’t clutch one’s pearls—this author’s views are not uncommon. You may think her/him wrong. Grapple directly with them.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bobbie Spellman
@BobbiePoPS
|
31. sij |
|
Why did the editor forward that review to the authors? Yeah I know we can get into a debate about whether editors should EDIT reviews. But this review is useless to the authors and just a scolding to the editor re: what is appropriate for consideration in the journal.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Chris Chambers
@chrisdc77
|
31. sij |
|
That is the Q. IME, revs like this sometimes also contain useful content, & since I don't like to edit reviews (for me it's all in or binned), it leaves the ed in a tricky situation. Had I edited this one, I'd have left it in but told authors they need not respond to this comment
|
||
|
|
||
|
Chris Chambers
@chrisdc77
|
31. sij |
|
Happy ending though -- the authors responded with admirable patience to this nonsense & the manuscript was accepted
|
||
|
|
||
|
Andrew Althouse
@ADAlthousePhD
|
31. sij |
|
I HAVE A DEGREE IN THIS FIELD!
|
||
|
|
||
|
Chris Chambers
@chrisdc77
|
31. sij |
|
I HAVE A HORSE
|
||
|
|
||
|
Liuba Papeo
@ljuba_pi
|
31. sij |
|
I don’t understand this public shaming of a comment written with kindness and that has some truth. 🙆♀️
|
||
|
|
||
|
Chris Chambers
@chrisdc77
|
31. sij |
|
Haha 🙃 But of course the reason I shared it in the 1st place was out of admiration and gratitude, and so we might all learn something
And the ONLY reason I think the professor should have signed this review was to claim rightful credit for such a wise and generous contribution
|
||
|
|
||
|
Reubs J Walsh
@reubsjw
|
31. sij |
|
And yet I’m not sure it’s an argument entirely without merit. Just an utterly absurd context in which to raise it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Chris Chambers
@chrisdc77
|
31. sij |
|
Yeah there are elements I could agree with. For example, I think there is strand of this comment that is basically saying "we aren't hypothesis testing in this field, so there is little or no point preregistering" & w/ certain caveats that IMO is defensible & maybe even sensible
|
||
|
|
||