Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Alex Holcombe
Open science is quality science. Open access . Dad. Pic is from reproducibility comic:
18.165
Tweetovi
2.516
Pratim
5.268
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Alex Holcombe 50 min
Odgovor korisniku/ci @ceptional
He sadly died in 2014. A lot of the early open science discussions, e.g. 2008, were on Friendfeed, until Facebook bought it in 2009.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe 50 min
Fun going back through my blog, which I started in 2008. My first post was about fat tails (). 2009 saw my first post about open science - . There was one comment, by Jean-Claude Bradley, the founder of open notebook science.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe 58 min
Odgovor korisniku/ci @NAChristakis @RepAdamSchiff
One of the easier calls in the history of history :)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe 3 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @kanatapora
I think you will find it with Google . I'm not on it but I suspect they are very helpful.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe 9 h
Odgovor korisniku/ci @kanatapora
Sorry I don't use MATLAB, I only use R for stats. Try the PsychToolbox forum?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe 3. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @SianHarris8
Good point
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @mglavica
Thanks! I'll have to figure out how to control for growth of the database overall.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @psforscher @jamesheathers
I'd love to see that for "open science" and "open access". I've noticed huge growth over the years.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @natesjacobs
Only transparent research can be fully vetted for quality. Therefore transparent research has much higher potential for quality. And transparent research can be built on much more easily, which is what should happen with research, making it higher quality.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe 2. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @jamesheathers
Give it to me.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe 2. velj
Anybody got some bibliometrics showing how rapidly meta-science is growing as a field?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe 2. velj
This will help. "A new ranking system for academic journals measuring their commitment to research transparency will be launched next month -- providing what many believe will be a useful alternative to journal impact scores."
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe 1. velj
Over 100 in Texas A&M alone? Should we multiply that by at least 20 to get the U.S. total, or is there reason to think they targeted a few systems?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe proslijedio/la je tweet
Joe Hilgard, the psych prof we all know and love 31. sij
Blog post: Are frauds incompetent? Why I think we're only catching a fraction of data fakers, and why data forensics isn't up to the task.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe 31. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @PaulBieniasz @chrisdc77 i 2 ostali
Due to the replication crisis being widespread (includes the likes of wet-lab cancer biology), the credibility of most fields is impaired with outsiders until they demonstrate they deserve it, via greater transparency.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe 31. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FSingletonThorn
Probably just about psych methods textbooks
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe 31. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FSingletonThorn
There's a paper on that isn't there?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @M_Cunningham6 @RachelEMenzies
Although to be fair, this was before the open access movement was in full swing, or even quarter swing, I think.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @MerlinPsychSage @C_Kavanagh
Yes the very low reliability has been shown by a few published studies of manusceipt reviews
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Alex Holcombe proslijedio/la je tweet
Torsten Reimer 29. sij
The argue that pre-prints on open platforms, not APCs are the solution for open science:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"