|
Alex Holcombe
@
ceptional
Sydney, Australia
|
|
Open science is quality science. Open access psyoa.org. Dad. Pic is from reproducibility comic: thenib.com/repeat-after-me
|
|
|
18.165
Tweetovi
|
2.516
Pratim
|
5.268
Osobe koje vas prate
|
| Tweetovi |
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
50 min |
|
He sadly died in 2014. A lot of the early open science discussions, e.g. 2008, were on Friendfeed, until Facebook bought it in 2009. cameronneylon.net/blog/end-of-fe…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
50 min |
|
Fun going back through my blog, which I started in 2008. My first post was about fat tails (alexholcombe.wordpress.com/page/16/). 2009 saw my first post about open science - alexholcombe.wordpress.com/2009/04/06/ope… . There was one comment, by Jean-Claude Bradley, the founder of open notebook science.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
58 min |
|
One of the easier calls in the history of history :)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
3 h |
|
I think you will find it with Google . I'm not on it but I suspect they are very helpful.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
9 h |
|
Sorry I don't use MATLAB, I only use R for stats. Try the PsychToolbox forum?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
3. velj |
|
Good point
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
2. velj |
|
Thanks! I'll have to figure out how to control for growth of the database overall.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
2. velj |
|
I'd love to see that for "open science" and "open access". I've noticed huge growth over the years.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
2. velj |
|
Only transparent research can be fully vetted for quality. Therefore transparent research has much higher potential for quality. And transparent research can be built on much more easily, which is what should happen with research, making it higher quality.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
2. velj |
|
Give it to me.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
2. velj |
|
Anybody got some bibliometrics showing how rapidly meta-science is growing as a field?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
2. velj |
|
This will help. "A new ranking system for academic journals measuring their commitment to research transparency will be launched next month -- providing what many believe will be a useful alternative to journal impact scores." ihenow.com/2GXlSrX
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
1. velj |
|
Over 100 in Texas A&M alone? Should we multiply that by at least 20 to get the U.S. total, or is there reason to think they targeted a few systems? twitter.com/Kate_OKeeffe/s…
|
||
|
|
||
| Alex Holcombe proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Joe Hilgard, the psych prof we all know and love
@JoeHilgard
|
31. sij |
|
Blog post: Are frauds incompetent? Why I think we're only catching a fraction of data fakers, and why data forensics isn't up to the task. crystalprisonzone.blogspot.com/2020/01/are-fr…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
31. sij |
|
Due to the replication crisis being widespread (includes the likes of wet-lab cancer biology), the credibility of most fields is impaired with outsiders until they demonstrate they deserve it, via greater transparency. pic.twitter.com/WNIMaTqJKT
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
31. sij |
|
Probably just about psych methods textbooks
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
31. sij |
|
There's a paper on that isn't there?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
30. sij |
|
Although to be fair, this was before the open access movement was in full swing, or even quarter swing, I think.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alex Holcombe
@ceptional
|
30. sij |
|
Yes the very low reliability has been shown by a few published studies of manusceipt reviews
|
||
|
|
||
| Alex Holcombe proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Torsten Reimer
@torstenreimer
|
29. sij |
|
The @OSFramework argue that pre-prints on open platforms, not APCs are the solution for open science: bit.ly/3aUe7Av #OpenAccess
|
||
|
|
||