Twitter | Search | |
Layne Norton, PhD
Dad. Owner of BioLayne LLC, Natural Pro BBer. Nutritional Science PhD, 2x USAPL 93kg Nat. Champ. Crusher of bullshit
51,049
Tweets
409
Following
91,862
Followers
Tweets
Layne Norton, PhD 3m
I understand the blowback against diet culture, but making blanket statements that are factually incorrect do not help anyone. Please consider the actual evidence.
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD 3h
this is the point. These LCHF zealots can't find anything factually wrong in the article, so instead they are simply upset that the data doesn't fit their bias, so they attempt to discredit the messenger
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD 3h
And this... is asking the right questions people
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD 3h
and round and round we go... as I said previously, the reason it took me 4 days to respond was because I was on my FUCKING HONEYMOON * would you care to actually address why you thought it was stupid or provide any evidence to support the claims you made?
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD 3h
WTF are you actually talking about? I always retweet my replies. Mostly because I like pointing out how hypocritical and stupid people like you are
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD 21h
Mason, how did I 'strip context' from your reply... I quoted your reply
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD Jun 25
I'm a bad guy because I refuse to demonize an individual nutrient based on evidence, but Fung can make up straight up lies because 'he cares.' *rolleyes* that mother fucker only cares about his wallet
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD Jun 25
saying that HFCS is not a toxin is not the same thing as 'supporting' it. I know that nuance and evidence is really difficult for you low carb zealots so I'm not surprised that you don't understand the difference
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD Jun 25
What message? The title of the article was EXACTLY the subject matter of the article?
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD Jun 25
LOL, the title of the article was exactly the subject matter of the article. Again, what about that is wrong? Whereas Chris never directly answered any of the questions or even stated what he disagreed with, instead tried to imply that I was paid off. Yet I'm the politician?
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD Jun 25
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD Jun 24
AGAIN, if you agree the article is accurate then why the hell are you so offended. The title of the article is "High Fructose Corn Syrup: Should We Be Afraid" which is exactly the subject of the article which you ADMIT is accurate... so again, please explain why you are offended?
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD Jun 24
Where was it supportive? And if you admit that the information is accurate, why are you so offended by it? Do facts and evidence offend you?
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD Jun 24
apologies, should have accused you of libel (written vs. spoke). You accused me of being sponsored by sugar which is false. also, you are deflecting again, this is comical now.
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD Jun 24
Ok Chris, what statements have I made in these threads that are false? Go ahead... I'll wait. I enjoy watching you fumble around making a fool out of yourself
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD Jun 24
Ok, so clarify here. I gave you the chance multiple times and you ducked the question every time.
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD Jun 24
So if the article is accurate, why are you worried about my motivations? My motivation is simple: spread evidence based information and dispel bullshit, the same as it's been for the last 15 years
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD Jun 24
I'm only a dick if you are someone who hates evidence =)
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD Jun 24
because I 1) like the way the monster zero tastes and 2) I like caffeine. also 3) because I'm part of the illuminati
Reply Retweet Like
Layne Norton, PhD Jun 24
ah, so now you are admitting that the article was accurate... so why are you so offended?
Reply Retweet Like