| Tweetovi |
|
Bchjam
@bchjam
|
30. sij |
|
|
||
|
Bchjam
@bchjam
|
29. sij |
|
Making paths out of dreams and illusory realities carries a feel of specialness because nobody likes to talk about the perceptual weirdness of perpetual existence. Getting sick and old in comparison seems maybe too simple, too pathetic, too harsh.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bchjam
@bchjam
|
23. sij |
|
CBT has a tiny seed of awareness lost in a sea of bias-bingo worksheets. It can maybe sorta help to notice how mental stances can be sepf-reinforcing at least. Those worksheets though, oy vey.
CBT was less frustrating than DBT...
|
||
|
|
||
| Bchjam proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Jessica Flack
@C4COMPUTATION
|
15. sij |
|
Complexity all the way down: What drives the evolution of new levels of organization + function? Complexity from simplicity no longer seems quite right. I argue instead for what i've been tentatively calling, "The hourglass theory of complexity". There is complexity (con’t) pic.twitter.com/kXAouJT7xq
|
||
|
|
||
| Bchjam proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Clockwise
@getclockwise
|
14. sij |
|
Good perspective from @mixteenth: "Don't we all just want remote work to be an option, at least part-time, for a larger number of people? If so let's be empathetic." blog.davidtate.org/remote-work-er…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bchjam
@bchjam
|
13. sij |
|
Perception is often weirdest when environment and memory are conflated. It's just that it happens all the time. Biases are like little systems of reinforcement that are easily led astray by that misdirection between what once was and what now seems to be.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bchjam
@bchjam
|
9. sij |
|
Watching traffic pass by and noticing blur vs still-frames.
Looking at a page of text as a single object and observing how individual words become anchored.
Also some visualizations like imagining a doubling of points til beyond blurriness, or envisioning a perfect circle.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bchjam
@bchjam
|
9. sij |
|
I have a pet theory that playing with optical illusions and related perceptual weirdness as a sort of object of meditation can serve as a useful antidote to being too deconstructive (or narrow/flat). Things like "Can you focus on two trees simultaneously?"
|
||
|
|
||
| Bchjam proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Bruno Maçães
@MacaesBruno
|
1. sij |
|
So the time has come to relearn how to think. Why should that be a bad thing anyway? Learning is fun
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bchjam
@bchjam
|
28. pro |
|
While it's usually true that our perceived limitations become our lived ones, killing ourselves to outdo this pattern is as futile as it is painful. (there may be other ways ...)
Also, "change the world" is maybe a misnomer, in reality more like "ride the change of the world".
|
||
|
|
||
| Bchjam proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Robin Hanson
@robinhanson
|
17. pro |
|
It is hard for humans to ever talk abstractly & actually get others to listen carefully enough to understand & make relevant responses. People have to work years to gain this power, mostly only in limited contexts. Even then it only lasts a limited time, after which they reghost.
|
||
|
|
||
| Bchjam proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Elements of Clojure
@elementsofclj
|
7. pro |
|
And so we do not want a system that is wholly principled. We want a collection of principled components, built to be discarded, separated by interfaces that are built to last.
|
||
|
|
||
| Bchjam proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Kate Hinds
@katehinds
|
4. pro |
|
This is too real pic.twitter.com/QU2dXi3ZCp
|
||
|
|
||
| Bchjam proslijedio/la je tweet | ||
|
Russell Roberts
@EconTalker
|
2. pro |
|
This week's EconTalk is Gerd Gigerenzer talking about the power of rules of thumb and his book, Gut Feelings: econtalk.org/gerd-gigerenze…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bchjam
@bchjam
|
28. stu |
|
I'm not here, this isn't happening.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bchjam
@bchjam
|
24. stu |
|
What if instead of a clipboard we had a context-board of recent interactions?
No explicit copy, only a short-term memory of relevant media artifacts. Aligning contexts provides a side door to serendipitous interaction.
How well does this collab framing apply to comms?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bchjam
@bchjam
|
24. stu |
|
Part of the unending challenge of collaborative tools is minimizing transitional friction between states of open and focus attention. All while enabling the differing opportunities those provide.
Less abstractly, can software facilitate both focused work and serendipity?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bchjam
@bchjam
|
23. stu |
|
Perception as a scaling mechanism: When people are unsure of a sudden change in their environment, they look to see where others are looking in order to assess their own suspicions. Speculative sense-making as a team sport also cultivates meaning.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bchjam
@bchjam
|
23. stu |
|
Trust seems elusively deep, similar to identity. How many layers or styles of trust can you consider? Does that scale up or do we have to pick particular aspects of trust (ie honest representation, showing evidence)? Can some forms of trust be harmful, like in-group signaling?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Bchjam
@bchjam
|
21. stu |
|
That (human) organizations are effectively systems of perception at scale. This provides a feedback loop for process dynamism. Maximizing for consistency among constituent processes is what perception is all about. Maintaining dynamism helps mitigate failure mode lock-in.
|
||
|
|
||