Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Bchjam
Perception geek. Needs a new jam...
202
Tweetovi
38
Pratim
59
Osobe koje vas prate
Tweetovi
Bchjam 30. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Meaningness
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam 29. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @_awbery_ @PoemsWeBurned
Making paths out of dreams and illusory realities carries a feel of specialness because nobody likes to talk about the perceptual weirdness of perpetual existence. Getting sick and old in comparison seems maybe too simple, too pathetic, too harsh.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam 23. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @_awbery_
CBT has a tiny seed of awareness lost in a sea of bias-bingo worksheets. It can maybe sorta help to notice how mental stances can be sepf-reinforcing at least. Those worksheets though, oy vey. CBT was less frustrating than DBT...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam proslijedio/la je tweet
Jessica Flack 15. sij
Complexity all the way down: What drives the evolution of new levels of organization + function? Complexity from simplicity no longer seems quite right. I argue instead for what i've been tentatively calling, "The hourglass theory of complexity". There is complexity (con’t)
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam proslijedio/la je tweet
Clockwise 14. sij
Good perspective from : "Don't we all just want remote work to be an option, at least part-time, for a larger number of people? If so let's be empathetic."
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam 13. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @AE_Robbert
Perception is often weirdest when environment and memory are conflated. It's just that it happens all the time. Biases are like little systems of reinforcement that are easily led astray by that misdirection between what once was and what now seems to be.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam 9. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @_awbery_
Watching traffic pass by and noticing blur vs still-frames. Looking at a page of text as a single object and observing how individual words become anchored. Also some visualizations like imagining a doubling of points til beyond blurriness, or envisioning a perfect circle.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam 9. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @_awbery_
I have a pet theory that playing with optical illusions and related perceptual weirdness as a sort of object of meditation can serve as a useful antidote to being too deconstructive (or narrow/flat). Things like "Can you focus on two trees simultaneously?"
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam proslijedio/la je tweet
Bruno Maçães 1. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @MacaesBruno
So the time has come to relearn how to think. Why should that be a bad thing anyway? Learning is fun
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam 28. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @StewartalsopIII
While it's usually true that our perceived limitations become our lived ones, killing ourselves to outdo this pattern is as futile as it is painful. (there may be other ways ...) Also, "change the world" is maybe a misnomer, in reality more like "ride the change of the world".
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam proslijedio/la je tweet
Robin Hanson 17. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @robinhanson
It is hard for humans to ever talk abstractly & actually get others to listen carefully enough to understand & make relevant responses. People have to work years to gain this power, mostly only in limited contexts. Even then it only lasts a limited time, after which they reghost.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam proslijedio/la je tweet
Elements of Clojure 7. pro
And so we do not want a system that is wholly principled. We want a collection of principled components, built to be discarded, separated by interfaces that are built to last.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam proslijedio/la je tweet
Kate Hinds 4. pro
This is too real
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam proslijedio/la je tweet
Russell Roberts 2. pro
This week's EconTalk is Gerd Gigerenzer talking about the power of rules of thumb and his book, Gut Feelings:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam 28. stu
I'm not here, this isn't happening.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam 24. stu
What if instead of a clipboard we had a context-board of recent interactions? No explicit copy, only a short-term memory of relevant media artifacts. Aligning contexts provides a side door to serendipitous interaction. How well does this collab framing apply to comms?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam 24. stu
Part of the unending challenge of collaborative tools is minimizing transitional friction between states of open and focus attention. All while enabling the differing opportunities those provide. Less abstractly, can software facilitate both focused work and serendipity?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam 23. stu
Perception as a scaling mechanism: When people are unsure of a sudden change in their environment, they look to see where others are looking in order to assess their own suspicions. Speculative sense-making as a team sport also cultivates meaning.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam 23. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @balajis
Trust seems elusively deep, similar to identity. How many layers or styles of trust can you consider? Does that scale up or do we have to pick particular aspects of trust (ie honest representation, showing evidence)? Can some forms of trust be harmful, like in-group signaling?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bchjam 21. stu
Odgovor korisniku/ci @eriktorenberg
That (human) organizations are effectively systems of perception at scale. This provides a feedback loop for process dynamism. Maximizing for consistency among constituent processes is what perception is all about. Maintaining dynamism helps mitigate failure mode lock-in.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"