Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Antonio García Martínez
Journalists used to provide distribution, so they were pandered to. Now they simply provide distortion, so they're ignored. To the formerly pandered, indifference feels like defensiveness, when it's merely the ingratiating mask falling off.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Mike Solana 31. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @antoniogm
it’s this
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dinesh Kulkarni 31. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @antoniogm
Great observation. I will also add Gell-Mann amnesia for my lack of trust: "the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues... read as if the rest of the newspaper was more accurate about... than the baloney you just read."
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dinesh Kulkarni 1. velj
Odgovor korisniku/ci @antoniogm
And another reminder of the variety of errors in journalists' analysis. Most readers are not that critical most of the time and bad news propagates because of that:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Sarah Cone 31. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @antoniogm
So this, also, it's baffling to me that they think they can save their failing organizations by producing journalism of sub-par quality.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Matt Larraz 31. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @antoniogm
This tweet should be read in Werner Herzog's voice
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Mr. Japen 31. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @antoniogm @webdevMason
"Journalist" is a meaningless term when used in this context. It can be interpreted however the reader wants to elicit a pre-established belief about journalism or specific media outlets. To say l journalists collectively used to/currently do one or the other is nonsense.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"