Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Andy Matuschak 3. lis
Tools for thought are a beautiful idea—inventions which can “change the thought patterns of an entire civilization.” But that’s a 30 year old quote. Why are they so hard to make? and I try to answer that question and suggest paths forward:
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Andy Matuschak
Modern design practice demands deep engagement with users' context: interviewing, embedding, reading, empathizing. Such a powerful discipline… yet it's hard to shake the sense that the people creating profound tools for thought are doing all those things—somehow way more deeply.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Andy Matuschak 11. lis
Odgovor korisniku/ci @michael_nielsen
In , and I argue that the most powerful tools for thought express deep, novel insights into the underlying subject matter. It's not enough to empathize with users—the designer must be able to produce original research in the target domain.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Andy Matuschak 11. lis
Odgovor korisniku/ci @andy_matuschak
On a personal level, that idea was the emotional core of the piece for me. I've really struggled with my relationship to design. I've felt enthralled and empowered by its remarkable practices, but also instinctively uneasy that the work I most admire seems subtly "apart" from it.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Andy Matuschak 11. lis
Odgovor korisniku/ci @michael_nielsen
Developing this piece with has helped me tentatively resolve that tension: it's a yes-and. This was a huge relief! I saw that the practices were somehow limited—but they were too predictive to write off, and I couldn't see how to subsume them.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Eli Schiff 16. lis
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"