Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Tyler Rogoway 5. sij
Amazing. Chimps have more RAM than humans.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Dan Kaminsky 6. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Aviation_Intel @kevinriggle
No evidence they normalized training time.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Kevin Riggle 6. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @dakami @Aviation_Intel
No evidence they didn’t either
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
James Wu 6. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @kevinriggle @dakami @Aviation_Intel
This is… really ick. 1) didn’t replicate well with human practice 2) a lot more at play in a spatial + digit location recall task than just “memory” 3) the evo tree diagram is NOT made by author, and temporal lobe was not focus
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
James Wu
Against all convention this… pop-sci VC promoter (??) has seemingly created his own diagram and put Matsuzawa 2013 on it, when that figure is NOT in the paper which also makes no Broca/Wernicke replacement claims - it discusses differences in prefrontal WM morphology development
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
James Wu 6. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @kevinriggle @dakami @Aviation_Intel
Ok a quick scan leads me to think this is an account that routinely takes (legitimate / good faith) research, makes fringe claims, cites original author names on claims they didn’t make, and push his own ventures. Like, this is a Not Even Wrong version of “energy efficiency”.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
James Wu 6. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @kevinriggle @dakami @Aviation_Intel
Some parts of photosynthesis (chromaphores) are oddly efficient. Whole system efficiency of photosynthesis is actually much less (3-5%) compared to even mass market solar energy - opposite of this account’s claim, which is just tacked on to legitimate research.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
James Wu 7. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @kevinriggle @dakami @Aviation_Intel
Correction: the image was sourced from lecture at . Didn’t check YouTube for slide decks; the image is in a slide from a Matsuzawa talk. I retract the first point here.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Hillel 7. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @analogist_net @kevinriggle i 2 ostali
Now if only he'd back up his other claims with something besides "30 YEARS OF RESEARCH"
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"