|
|
@almostlikethat | |||||
|
One hypothesis I have (for at least some accounts) is that it means one's "audio/phonological loop of the ~3 second auditory now" has no imaginary content in it. No speech rehearsal. No tulpa whispers. No musical earworms.
JUST representations of environmental air vibrations.
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Fate Of Twist
@FateOfTwist_
|
2. kol |
|
Are there any accounts of "emptiness", preferably purely phenomenological/methodological, that don't presume a contentious metaphysics?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Fate Of Twist
@FateOfTwist_
|
2. kol |
|
What even is a "representation of environmental air vibrations"?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jennifer RM
@almostlikethat
|
2. kol |
|
Subjectively, it is a perception of a durably externally localizable "sound" that resists reality-testing falsification attempts across sensory domains and over time.
"Is that my imagination or is the car radio at volume 1?"
Test test test...
Turns out: car radio (or not).
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Jennifer RM
@almostlikethat
|
2. kol |
|
Within this model (accepting subjective cognitive variation as a thing usually obscured by the "typical mind fallacy") some people might have a tulpa that calls itself "I" and which calls its imaginary auditory production "my thoughts". These people are not "empty of thought".
|
||
|
|
||