Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Fate Of Twist 2. kol
Are there any accounts of "emptiness", preferably purely phenomenological/methodological, that don't presume a contentious metaphysics?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jennifer RM
One hypothesis I have (for at least some accounts) is that it means one's "audio/phonological loop of the ~3 second auditory now" has no imaginary content in it. No speech rehearsal. No tulpa whispers. No musical earworms. JUST representations of environmental air vibrations.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Fate Of Twist 2. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @almostlikethat
What even is a "representation of environmental air vibrations"?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jennifer RM 2. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FateOfTwist_
Subjectively, it is a perception of a durably externally localizable "sound" that resists reality-testing falsification attempts across sensory domains and over time. "Is that my imagination or is the car radio at volume 1?" Test test test... Turns out: car radio (or not).
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jennifer RM 2. kol
Odgovor korisniku/ci @FateOfTwist_
Within this model (accepting subjective cognitive variation as a thing usually obscured by the "typical mind fallacy") some people might have a tulpa that calls itself "I" and which calls its imaginary auditory production "my thoughts". These people are not "empty of thought".
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"