|
@alibreland | |||||
|
here’s a copy of an internal email google sent to its employees about firing kathryn. for context, kathryn said she wasn’t aware of these policies and google hasn’t yet pointed me to where these rules previously existed (i’ve asked) pic.twitter.com/qtzO8e5tXt
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Ali Breland
@alibreland
|
17. pro |
|
New: another Google worker says that she was fired for supporting union organizing efforts within the company and has filed a complaint with the NLRB motherjones.com/politics/2019/…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ali Breland
@alibreland
|
17. pro |
|
people really don't know what rule google was referencing and they have yet to provide any info on how there was any precedent or actual policy in place prior to their firing kathryn twitter.com/SophieJusticeW…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ali Breland
@alibreland
|
17. pro |
|
extremely useful context from former google employee @lizthegrey on how these processes work twitter.com/lizthegrey/sta…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真)
@lizthegrey
|
17. pro |
|
Just to contextualize this: twitter.com/lizthegrey/sta…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ali Breland
@alibreland
|
17. pro |
|
thanks!
|
||
|
|
||
|
Andy
@Seglegs
|
17. pro |
|
Give workers unrestricted access
Workers use access
Retroactively claim that access was fireable
Nice way to fire anyone.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Phil Weiss
@philwdjjd
|
17. pro |
|
“It’s not because of that thing that it’s not allowed to be” is always a sign of good behavior. @NLRB
|
||
|
|
||
|
iandanforth - Berlin
@iandanforth
|
17. pro |
|
Cultural infection much? pic.twitter.com/WpGLHhuwXr
|
||
|
|
||
|
Aaron M Fisher
@aaronmfisher
|
17. pro |
|
Pushing back against union busting is both about privacy and security, period. Also, to be clear, the pop up only displayed when a user went to the union busting website. It was not a wide push notification. Notifications are this decades soap box, get used to it Google!!
|
||
|
|
||
|
Joe Ortiz
@LeoJTravis10
|
17. pro |
|
If you do, consider a Librem 5 as a replacement: puri.sm/products/libre…
|
||
|
|
||