|
@alethenorio | |||||
|
Really good read. Could you explain the AGPL comment? I am confused as to why it would be considered modifying the program.
Wouldn't the program (As defined in the AGPL clause) in this case be the AGPLed dependency which is not going to be changed but instead just used?
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Andrew Ayer
@__agwa
|
5. sij |
|
New blog post: This Is Why You Always Review Your Dependencies, AGPL Edition agwa.name/blog/post/alwa…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Andrew Ayer
@__agwa
|
5. sij |
|
Thanks!
The FSF considers any kind of linking to a (A)GPL-licensed software component to be a modification, requiring the entire combined work to be (A)GPL-licensed also. This blog post goes into greater detail: fsf.org/licensing/zfs-…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Alexandre Thenorio
@alethenorio
|
8. sij |
|
Thank you.
|
||
|
|
||