Opens profile photo
Follow
Addison Del Mastro
@ad_mastro
Writer/Editor, with a focus on urbanism, culture, popular history. a.delmastro2@gmail.com
Northern Virginiathedeletedscenes.substack.comJoined May 2017

Addison Del Mastro’s Tweets

Pinned Tweet
"If you strip away the culture-war overlay, you will find no evidence that there is actually any such thing as a 'small town,' as we currently conceive of it." I'm in sharpening my idea that urban settlements are a single species:
6
28
Show this thread
Amen and amen to this.
Quote Tweet
The near occasion of sin, and the idea of temptation, generally comes up when we talk about vices: drinking, gambling and, of course, sex. I propose that driving is a potential source of temptation and sin. americamagazine.org/politics-socie
1
The near occasion of sin, and the idea of temptation, generally comes up when we talk about vices: drinking, gambling and, of course, sex. I propose that driving is a potential source of temptation and sin.
1
9
Great thoughts from one of my fav social writers these days (and fellow Jersey Boy)
Quote Tweet
When we reflexively associate temptation with sex and vice, we can forget the ways in which temptation and even sin can come up in more mundane situations. Like driving. My Catholic case for driving less and being wary of the car: americamagazine.org/politics-socie
Show this thread
2
“In what other setting would we be angry at a person we almost just killed? In what other setting would we find that sentiment entirely rational and appropriate?”
Quote Tweet
When we reflexively associate temptation with sex and vice, we can forget the ways in which temptation and even sin can come up in more mundane situations. Like driving. My Catholic case for driving less and being wary of the car: americamagazine.org/politics-socie
Show this thread
3
The grave responsibility of getting behind the wheel can be done with patience, attention and virtue. We should strive for that. But we should keep in mind that if anything should cause us to sin, Jesus told us what to do with it.
1
2
Show this thread
The point is not that motorists are bad people; rather, it is that something about driving itself, or at least as it is done in the United States, can distort the moral sense of good people. It can do that to you and me.
1
6
Show this thread
I think of the guy I saw who almost hit a woman in a parking lot. She angrily hit his car. He got angry at her. In what other setting would we be angry at a person we almost just killed? In what other setting would we find that sentiment entirely rational and appropriate?
1
6
Show this thread
This is not good for us. It can be an occasion of sin. We should try to tame that feeling - that desire to speed, to dehumanize other road users, etc. But frankly, we should also realize that something about the car does that to us, and be cautious of that.
1
5
Show this thread
Sitting behind the wheel in most of the United States produces a constant, gnawing frustration due to the car’s capacity—speed—being limited by the reality of driving surrounded by so many fellow human beings.
1
5
Show this thread
When we reflexively associate temptation with sex and vice, we can forget the ways in which temptation and even sin can come up in more mundane situations. Like driving. My Catholic case for driving less and being wary of the car:
1
28
Show this thread
It's striking that suburbia arose during the baby boom, and is widely considered the "right" place to start families/raise kids, and yet...there is a real misanthropic/Malthusian streak that is the negation of being pro-family
Quote Tweet
Aspen Hill neighbors want sidewalks so their kids can safely walk to school; one resident who doesn’t want a sidewalk in front of her house replies “little kids like this shouldn’t be walking to school by themselves anyway” 🤮 buff.ly/3peiyBK
13
240
Show this thread
As I sometimes say when I'm among conservative NIMBYs, if you're pro-life you must be pro-housing, because babies become neighbors. At the heart of NIMBYism and the physical form of modern suburbia itself is the idea that people are a nuisance.
3
36
Show this thread
The idea of low-density suburbs is (maybe) kid-friendly, but it is (definitely) hostile to the idea of the next generation. It is zero-sum. I do not think you can be pro-family and be pro-suburbia.
2
31
Show this thread
There's something deep here, though. I think about this conflict between "family friendly" in the micro sense of "a nice environment for a kid to grow up in," vs. "family friendly in the macro sense of "a land-use regime and housing market that welcomes growing populations."
1
26
Show this thread
There are so many ways our thinking is screwed up on these matters. This reminds me of the real-estate listings that say "quiet cul-de-sac location without traffic." They *almost* get it, I think.
2
31
Show this thread
It's striking that suburbia arose during the baby boom, and is widely considered the "right" place to start families/raise kids, and yet...there is a real misanthropic/Malthusian streak that is the negation of being pro-family
Quote Tweet
Aspen Hill neighbors want sidewalks so their kids can safely walk to school; one resident who doesn’t want a sidewalk in front of her house replies “little kids like this shouldn’t be walking to school by themselves anyway” 🤮 buff.ly/3peiyBK
13
240
Show this thread
The insight here is that human behavior is dynamic. (Something conservatives understand except regarding anything to do with cars)
Quote Tweet
Replying to @WarrenJWells and @Kenmcld
But adding tolerance to *streets* (i.e. higher design speed than posted speed) just tricks people into driving too fast. By encouraging faster speeds, you lose whatever safety benefit more "tolerance" would have gotten you.
1
7