Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Charlie El. Awbery a.k.a. Rin’dzin Pamo 28. sij
Sometimes Buddhist Tantra can seem frustrating, annoying and incomprehensible. It’s not unusual for people to want Tantra to be something it isn’t, like an extension of what they’re already doing, on steroids or something.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Charlie El. Awbery a.k.a. Rin’dzin Pamo 28. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @_awbery_
Because everything that Buddhist Tantra does stems from its base in experience of emptiness, unless you are familiar with a state of mind that is relaxed and clutter-free, Tantra will refuse to be the thing that you want it to be.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jared Janes 28. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @_awbery_
In this context... Do you see a valuable distinction between the emptiness of form &/or the form of emptiness?
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Charlie El. Awbery a.k.a. Rin’dzin Pamo
Stuff looks different when you’re already uninvolved, maybe? Whereas encountering uninvolvement is really annoying from a manipulative standpoint.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
Jared Janes 28. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @_awbery_
I think I'm tracking & that follows... just wondering if either of these entry points to emptiness is more foundational to tantra.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Charlie El. Awbery a.k.a. Rin’dzin Pamo 28. sij
Odgovor korisniku/ci @JaredJanes
Oh, I see. No, I don’t think so in principle. But it’s easy to kid yourself that you understand emptiness as the emptiness aspect of form in every day life or whatever, whereas familiarity with form as it arises from an empty mind state is kind of unmistakeable.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"