Twitter | Pretraživanje | |
Yascha Mounk 21. pro
Climate change is very real and very dangerous. It's key that we be precise about what awaits us. That makes this tweet remarkable: It basically amounts to a retraction of "The Uninhabitable Earth," the most-read article in the history of New York Magazine, by its own author.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Yascha Mounk
My deep respect to for reporting this news. May all journalists writing about climate change follow his lead: The facts are bad enough to justify urgent action on climate change. Attempts to scare people into action by going beyond the science will only backfire.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se" More
OPA 21. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Yascha_Mounk @dwallacewells
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
DG 21. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Yascha_Mounk @dwallacewells
Sure. But is inaccurate reporting on “worst case doom and gloom” v. “middle of the road bad” scenario really what’s driving inaction? This is such a sideshow.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
DG 21. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Yascha_Mounk @dwallacewells
“Hmm these models not showing at least a temporary dip below 400ppm really are operating on some untested assumptions. I’m going to err on the side of complete and total inaction.” - Fox News viewer in suburban Orlando evacuating the climate change reporting lol
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Bernhard Isopp 21. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Yascha_Mounk @dwallacewells
"Going beyond the science" has worked really well for climate "sceptics"/deniers...
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
JCH of AGW 22. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Yascha_Mounk @dwallacewells
By far the bigger risk is falling short of the science.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
waxmonkey 21. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Yascha_Mounk @dwallacewells
This story says that the unexpected drop in cost of renewables has lead to larger adoption than expected, which shifts where we end up with a "business as usual" approach, which goes from very very very very bad to very very very bad.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
waxmonkey 21. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Yascha_Mounk @dwallacewells
And the second half of the story goes on to detail that our best case scenarios are no longer realistic - too much damage has been and is being done already.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Jack Eddyfier 21. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Yascha_Mounk @dwallacewells
In my experience journalists know nothing about climate nor science, and increasingly less about "reporting". Writing the "news", and "constructing narratives" seems to be one big woke ego trip for you people.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"
Morgan Rodwell 21. pro
Odgovor korisniku/ci @Yascha_Mounk @dwallacewells
Adaptation is the only thing we can do efficiently. Stopping climate from changing be reducing emissions rapidly is impossible because you need global agreement, which isn't going to happen.
Reply Retweet Označi sa "sviđa mi se"